Ok, we ran XMail under valgrind, and it did not leak. My RSS on
xmailserver.org never went over 8MB. My suggestion is to try a server
with an older glibc. Can ppl having a decent load on Linux systems
post the RSS value they get from 'ps'?
Maybe it's our huge filters tabs (in ~ 1900 eintries,
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Sönke Ruempler wrote:
Ok, we ran XMail under valgrind, and it did not leak. My RSS on
xmailserver.org never went over 8MB. My suggestion is to try a server
with an older glibc. Can ppl having a decent load on Linux systems
post the RSS value they get from 'ps'?
Why don't you use Debian on servers? I really don't know that the problem
is. My RH8 machine also runs glibc 2.3.2 (freshrpms), and the RSS stays
put. Suggestion is, give Debian a shot before. True that the base install
is really old, but an apt-get will bring you up to date.
We are RedHat
XMail 1.18 runs now about a week with LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 and the
RSS is about 114MB(!). I think that is _NOT_ normal.
Davide? RSS now 128 MB ;(
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Sönke Ruempler wrote:
XMail 1.18 runs now about a week with LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 and the
RSS is about 114MB(!). I think that is _NOT_ normal.
Davide? RSS now 128 MB ;(
Ok, we ran XMail under valgrind, and it did not leak. My RSS on
xmailserver.org never went over
With
smtp ~2.6 Msg/Min last Month and
pop3 ~4.5 Ses/Min last Month
on a SuSE 8.2 system, compiled with gcc version 3.3 20030226
(prerelease) (SuSE Linux) with kernel 2.4.20-4GB-athlon
$ ps aux tells:
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
root 12973 0.0
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Achim Schmidt wrote:
With
smtp ~2.6 Msg/Min last Month and
pop3 ~4.5 Ses/Min last Month
on a SuSE 8.2 system, compiled with gcc version 3.3 20030226
(prerelease) (SuSE Linux) with kernel 2.4.20-4GB-athlon
$ ps aux tells:
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY
Heres the information:
$ rpm -q glibc
glibc-2.3.2-6
$ uptime
7:32pm up 201 days 3:10, 1 user, load average: 0.23, 0.24, 0.20
ps:
logfiles switched from 200403272300 to 20040329
^^ ^^
but it doens't really matter for me (as i know it
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Achim Schmidt wrote:
Heres the information:
$ rpm -q glibc
glibc-2.3.2-6
$ uptime
7:32pm up 201 days 3:10, 1 user, load average: 0.23, 0.24, 0.20
Sorry, I meant XMail uptime ...
ps:
logfiles switched from 200403272300 to 20040329
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Achim Schmidt wrote:
Am Fr, 2004-04-02 um 19.46 schrieb Davide Libenzi:
Sorry, I meant XMail uptime ...
if i can believe ps aux, XMail was started on Jan28
This is strange. In my machine on xmailserver.org they are all .
Can you try to run the program below
Davide Libenzi wrote:
XMail 1.18 runs now about a week with LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 and the
RSS is about 114MB(!). I think that is _NOT_ normal.
Davide? RSS now 128 MB ;(
Ok, we ran XMail under valgrind, and it did not leak. My RSS on
xmailserver.org never went over 8MB. My suggestion is
Am Fr, 2004-04-02 um 22.00 schrieb Davide Libenzi:
Ok, if you look carefully, all the rotation strings (rotstr) are perfectly
aligned to . This simple program uses exactly the same code that
XMail uses to generate log file names. Can you try to stop/start XMail to
see how it goes?
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004, Achim Schmidt wrote:
Am Fr, 2004-04-02 um 22.00 schrieb Davide Libenzi:
Ok, if you look carefully, all the rotation strings (rotstr) are perfectly
aligned to . This simple program uses exactly the same code that
XMail uses to generate log file names. Can you try
Davide Libenzi wrote:
I restartet XMail an hour before midnight - and the logfiles where again
correctly rotated at - i'll have a look what happens in 6
months...
Ok, I know what's going on. Glibc caches the timezone info, so if XMail
started in a non-daylight saving time, it'll keep
But I will report if something stranges happens again. As i told the
XMailservers crashed exactly at the same time, they are in different
pl= aces and the start time was NOT the same.
=20
Very mystic ...
Not just 2.4 but 2.4.1. The problem is with kernels 2.4.2 and up.
XMail 1.18 runs now
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Sönke Ruempler wrote:
Running pre12 since this morning on our high loaded main server
without any problems. I hope the RSS / crash problem is now solved
:-)
The RSS growing is not XMail fault. You still need LD_ASSUME_KERNEL.
pre12 scrambles messages, too! I
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Michael Schwarz wrote:
When you say 'pre12 scrambles messages' what do you mean exactly ?
samples ?
I sent samples to Davide. It scrambles messages in
conjunctions with filters
that worked before. With pre12 some attachments are delivered wrong.
On my
When you say 'pre12 scrambles messages' what do you mean exactly ?
samples ?
I sent samples to Davide. It scrambles messages in
conjunctions with filters
that worked before. With pre12 some attachments are delivered wrong.
On my server at business there was three messages with
Michael Schwarz wrote:
On my server at business there was three messages with Excel-Files as
attachment wrong. One I can read but not the others, the other files
could nobody open. (The message are split to two or more reciptents
on our ISP-Mailserver, so it arrived at xmail as two or three
Running pre12 since this morning on our high loaded main server
without any problems. I hope the RSS / crash problem is now solved
:-)
The RSS growing is not XMail fault. You still need LD_ASSUME_KERNEL.
pre12 scrambles messages, too! I downgraded again.
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
When you say 'pre12 scrambles messages' what do you mean exactly ?
samples ?
-Message d'origine-
De : S=F6nke Ruempler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoy=E9 : jeudi 18 mars 2004 15:26
=C0 : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : [xmail] Re: 1.18-pre09 problem(?)
=20
=20
Running pre12 since
Thx ! Keep me posted if something strange happen.
Running pre12 since this morning on our high loaded main server without any
problems. I hope the RSS / crash problem is now solved :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sönke Ruempler schreef:
Thx ! Keep me posted if something strange happen.
Running pre12 since this morning on our high loaded main server without any
problems. I hope the RSS / crash problem is now solved :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body
I received the mail ok here from the list !
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De : Peter Lindeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoy=E9 : mercredi 17 mars 2004 16:34
=C0 : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : [xmail] Re: 1.18-pre09 problem(?)
=20
=20
S=F6nke Ruempler schreef:
=20
Thx ! Keep me
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Sönke Ruempler wrote:
Thx ! Keep me posted if something strange happen.
Running pre12 since this morning on our high loaded main server without any
problems. I hope the RSS / crash problem is now solved :-)
The RSS growing is not XMail fault. You still need
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Peter Lindeman wrote:
MAIL-DATA
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xmail); Wed, 17 Mar 2004 05:56:14 -0800 (PST)
Did something went wrong on x35.xmailserver.org? It looks like another
spool message orso was appended to this message!
Weird. It looks like the raw
Davide Libenzi pravi:
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Peter Lindeman wrote:
MAIL-DATA
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xmail); Wed, 17 Mar 2004 05:56:14 -0800 (PST)
Did something went wrong on x35.xmailserver.org? It looks like another
spool message orso was appended to this message!
Weird.
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Sasa Stupar wrote:
Hmmm, maybe it is time to change to Mailman. ;)
Let's try to not finger-point :-) ... at least until I know what the exact
problem is.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
I'm not trying to start anything but how is it not Xmail's fault that the
RSS keeps growing ?
I can't think of any other software that requires me to force it to tell it
i'm using a different kernel then i am.
Thx ! Keep me posted if something strange happen.
Running pre12 since this morning
I'm not trying to start anything but how is it not Xmail's fault
that the RSS keeps growing ?
I can't think of any other software that requires me to force it to
tell it i'm using a different kernel then i am.
Try to google for LD_ASSUME_KERNEL ...
so i have to put
export
S=F6nke Ruempler pravi:
I'm not trying to start anything but how is it not Xmail's fault
that the RSS keeps growing ?
I can't think of any other software that requires me to force it to
tell it i'm using a different kernel then i am.
Try to google for LD_ASSUME_KERNEL ...
=20
=20
so i have to
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Peter Lindeman wrote:
Davide Libenzi wrote:
Thx for testing it. It is running fine even on xmailserver.org. Are
you running filters? Do they ever return 7 (message changed)?
yes, SA !
Great thx! I am still missing BSD and Solaris testers. If noone are using
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
Davide -
I have been running pre12 since last night, all rcs OK, looks
good now.
Thx ! Keep me posted if something strange happen.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
Davide Libenzi schreef:
Thx for testing it. It is running fine even on xmailserver.org. Are
you running filters? Do they ever return 7 (message changed)?
yes, SA !
Great thx! I am still missing BSD and Solaris testers. If noone are using
XMail on those system maybe I should remove the support
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Peter Lindeman wrote:
Messages from the list which never have been delivered from
x35.xmailserver.org to my mailserver. You haven't seen my messages about
it, if so then probably more message are going to /dev/nul
I believe it is ecartis. I have just found 3 ecartis
Davide Libenzi wrote:
Messages from the list which never have been delivered from
x35.xmailserver.org to my mailserver. You haven't seen my messages about
it, if so then probably more message are going to /dev/nul
I believe it is ecartis. I have just found 3 ecartis processes stuck doing
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Peter Lindeman wrote:
Davide Libenzi wrote:
Messages from the list which never have been delivered from
x35.xmailserver.org to my mailserver. You haven't seen my messages about
it, if so then probably more message are going to /dev/nul
I believe it is ecartis.
Thx ! It seems that in your setup, after a timeout (-5), filters will
always get timeouts. This is weird. I removed a feature I had added in
recent preXX and I made pre12:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.18-pre12.tar.gz
Running pre12 on local server and testing.
No problems ATM.
-
To
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Sönke Ruempler wrote:
Thx ! It seems that in your setup, after a timeout (-5), filters will
always get timeouts. This is weird. I removed a feature I had added in
recent preXX and I made pre12:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.18-pre12.tar.gz
Running pre12 on
Thx for testing it. It is running fine even on xmailserver.org. Are
you running filters? Do they ever return 7 (message changed)?
yes, SA !
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Sönke Ruempler wrote:
Thx for testing it. It is running fine even on xmailserver.org. Are
you running filters? Do they ever return 7 (message changed)?
yes, SA !
Great thx! I am still missing BSD and Solaris testers. If noone are using
XMail on those system maybe I
Davide Libenzi wrote:
Thx for testing it. It is running fine even on xmailserver.org. Are
you running filters? Do they ever return 7 (message changed)?
yes, SA !
Great thx! I am still missing BSD and Solaris testers. If noone are using
XMail on those system maybe I should remove the
On Monday 15 March 2004 10:31 am, Peter Lindeman wrote:
Davide Libenzi wrote:
Thx for testing it. It is running fine even on xmailserver.org. Are
you running filters? Do they ever return 7 (message changed)?
yes, SA !
Great thx! I am still missing BSD and Solaris testers. If noone are
I have been running pre12 since last night, all rcs OK, looks
good now.
Same here, i will install it on our fallback now and on main server
tommorow.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line
Hello,
It sounds more like a bad line return (aka not a \r\n) on 1 for more
the messages header lines.
rather then xmail not observing the code return of 7.
-- Chris L. Franklin --
- Original Message -
From: Beau E. Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: mlist.xmail
Sent: Sunday, March
Chris L. Franklin wrote:
Hello,
It sounds more like a bad line return (aka not a \r\n) on 1 for more
the messages header lines.
rather then xmail not observing the code return of 7.
This is strange, I didn't receive the original message of Beau here in
the list. Is this because
On Sunday 14 March 2004 12:00 am, Peter Lindeman wrote:
(2004-01-11) on cathy.beaucox.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.63
Chris L. Franklin wrote:
Hello,
It sounds more like a bad line return (aka not a \r\n) on 1 for
Beau E. Cox wrote:
(2004-01-11) on cathy.beaucox.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.63
Chris L. Franklin wrote:
Hello,
It sounds more like a bad line return (aka not a \r\n) on 1 for
more the messages header lines.
rather then xmail
I resend the message below to the list because I did not get it myself
from the list. As I check my logs here it was sended. This is what is in
the smail log file :
lindeman.nl 1079275079528.3561499.server.lindeman.org S4358C
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] SMTP
Davide Libenzi wrote:
This is strange, I didn't receive the original message of Beau here in
the list. Is this because 1.18pre09 is running here or another problem?
Boy, I don't know. I did one 'radical' change on Thur night:
upgraded my Linux kernel from 2.4.25 to 2.6.4. But my origional
1.18
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Peter Lindeman wrote:
Mind trying pre10?
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.18-pre10.tar.gz
I would be really interested in seeing the return codes that XMail sees
from filters (Filter run: ...) ...
Is this also usefull for the messages that seems to
Davide Libenzi wrote:
Are you guys able to replicate an off-line XMail setup identical to the
one you are using? To setup a trivial test suite that sends a burst of
messages to an account an cross-check them. Yesterday I was using this to
feed messages to my test XMail setup:
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Peter Lindeman wrote:
Davide Libenzi wrote:
Are you guys able to replicate an off-line XMail setup identical to the
one you are using? To setup a trivial test suite that sends a burst of
messages to an account an cross-check them. Yesterday I was using this to
Davide Libenzi wrote:
I cannot setup an extra test identical to what I am running very soon. I
will try pre 10 on my server and continue testing.
It seems that the problem was triggered by SA. I had a filter yesterday
that was simulating message change (rc 7), and it was working fine
On Sunday 14 March 2004 06:14 am, Davide Libenzi wrote:
sin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on cathy.beaucox.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3D0.0 required=3D5.0 tests=3Dnone autolearn=3Dno
version=3D2.63
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Peter Lindeman wrote:
Davide Libenzi wrote:
Are you guys able to
On Sunday 14 March 2004 07:41 am, Beau E. Cox wrote:
On Sunday 14 March 2004 06:14 am, Davide Libenzi wrote:
sin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on cathy.beaucox.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3D0.0 required=3D5.0 tests=3Dnone autolearn=3Dno
version=3D2.63
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Peter
Beau E. Cox wrote:
Good Morning (it's early at GMT+10 ;) ),
Just installed pre10 and am logging in debug mode.
Will try to force a test as above.
=46rom looking at overnight messages, it seems that the problem,
once triggered, persists. All messages good until about 3am local then
bad until
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
Good Morning (it's early at GMT+10 ;) ),
Just installed pre10 and am logging in debug mode.
Will try to force a test as above.
=46rom looking at overnight messages, it seems that the problem,
once triggered, persists. All messages good until
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
Good Morning (it's early at GMT+10 ;) ),
Just installed pre10 and am logging in debug mode.
Will try to force a test as above.
=46rom looking at overnight messages, it seems that the problem,
On Sunday 14 March 2004 09:22 am, Davide Libenzi wrote:
sin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on cathy.beaucox.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.63
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
Good Morning
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
Oh Davide, Davide...
Tweaked SysDepLinux to log debug messages to real syslog.
Please look at debug output (pre10) at:
http://beaucox.com/xmaildebuglog.html
Notice filter rc's of -5; that's when the troubles begin.
I haven't looked that up
61 matches
Mail list logo
