No options. If filter fail to run without returning a error code, xmail
continues as if filter returned 'ok'
And IMHO it's the best solution, as 99% filters generaly reject only a few
number of mails and if you had the option to say to xmail 'reject when any
filter don't run or timeout', you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tuesday, November 01, 2005 9:54 PM:
Is there a way to configure XMail to reject the incoming mail if the
smtp filter fails to execute for whatever reason and thus failing to
return exit code 3?
No XMail-native chance. Maybe a simple shell script as wrapper could
My question originates from a win2000 server problem when it was
failling to crate any new proccesses, thus it wouldn't also be able to
create a wrapper script to check for valid filter return code. The
real problem was in that it happened overnight and XMail excepted quite
a few virus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, November 02, 2005 10:59
AM:
My question originates from a win2000 server problem when it was
failling to crate any new proccesses, thus it wouldn't also
be able to
create a wrapper script to check for valid filter return code. The
real problem was in
Hello,
I guess If your OS cannot create processes (never heard that
before) you
should file some bug report to Mickeysoft ;-)
No memory left may be quite a valid reason for not creating processes, even
with *nix. :-)
If it's an SMTP-filter limiting SMTP-threads so there's enough memory
-Message d'origine-
De : Sönke Ruempler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mercredi 2 novembre 2005 11:07
À : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: Failed filter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, November
02, 2005 10:59
AM:
My question originates from
reducing the risk of such filter failure.
Matic
CLEMENT Francis pravi:
-Message d'origine-
De : Sönke Ruempler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mercredi 2 novembre 2005 11:07
À : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: Failed filter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday
