[xmail] Re: Local domain and trailing dot

2006-11-02 Thread Francesco Vertova
At 00.25 30/10/06, you wrote: Ok, this comes from 2005 but I'm going through stuff to include in 1.23. The trailing dot is not legal, according to section 4.1.2 of: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2821.html Path = [ A-d-l : ] Mailbox Mailbox = Local-part @ Domain Domain = (sub-domain 1*(.

[xmail] Re: Local domain and trailing dot

2006-11-02 Thread Rob Arends
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Francesco Vertova Sent: Thursday, 2 November 2006 8:51 PM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Re: Local domain and trailing dot At 00.25 30/10/06, you wrote: Ok, this comes from 2005 but I'm going through stuff to include in 1.23

[xmail] Re: Local domain and trailing dot

2006-11-02 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Francesco Vertova wrote: At 00.25 30/10/06, you wrote: Ok, this comes from 2005 but I'm going through stuff to include in 1.23. The trailing dot is not legal, according to section 4.1.2 of: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2821.html Path = [ A-d-l : ] Mailbox

[xmail] Re: Local domain and trailing dot

2006-10-30 Thread CLEMENT Francis
-Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi Envoyé : lundi 30 octobre 2006 05:08 À : xmail@xmailserver.org Objet : [xmail] Re: Local domain and trailing dot On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, Jason J. Ellingson wrote: I would like to humbly disagree

[xmail] Re: Local domain and trailing dot

2006-10-30 Thread Shiloh Jennings
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of CLEMENT Francis Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 7:55 AM To: 'xmail@xmailserver.org' Subject: [xmail] Re: Local domain and trailing dot I agree with Davide RFC not only apply to MTA but to MUA too and to final users too (programs or humans) :) As the MUA

[xmail] Re: Local domain and trailing dot

2006-10-30 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Shiloh Jennings wrote: In the business world, end users only care if the recipient received the email they sent. They don't not know or care anything about RFC = compliance. I agree RFC compliance is important, but it should not trump the real = world concerns of

[xmail] Re: Local domain and trailing dot

2006-10-29 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Francesco Vertova wrote: At 12.45 09/11/05, you wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tuesday, November 08, 2005 6:41 PM: I dunno exactly what RFC says about that. I guess the hostname domain.net. is valid, but i have no idea how this DNS issue should be treated

[xmail] Re: Local domain and trailing dot

2006-10-29 Thread Shiloh Jennings
To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Re: Local domain and trailing dot On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Francesco Vertova wrote: At 12.45 09/11/05, you wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tuesday, November 08, 2005 6:41 PM: I dunno exactly what RFC says about that. I guess the hostname domain.net

[xmail] Re: Local domain and trailing dot

2006-10-29 Thread Jason J. Ellingson
] On Behalf Of Shiloh Jennings Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 6:02 PM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Re: Local domain and trailing dot Regardless of the RFC, ignoring a trailing dot would be helpful for end users. For example, a user might write My email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] When

[xmail] Re: Local domain and trailing dot

2006-10-29 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, Jason J. Ellingson wrote: I would like to humbly disagree. The trailing . is valid as a reference to the root domain of the internet. It could be interpreted as (. NULL) I on't think it's a matter of persoal opinions here. The RFC2821 definition of Domain does not

[xmail] Re: Local domain and trailing dot

2005-12-14 Thread Leonardo Fogel
domain.net. is not recognized as local, which leads to a mail loop. Can anybody confirm this? Hi. I have already faced the same problem. I just added an alias domain: domain.net domain.net.. Regards.

[xmail] Re: Local domain and trailing dot

2005-11-11 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Francesco Vertova wrote: At 12.45 09/11/05, you wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tuesday, November 08, 2005 6:41 PM: I dunno exactly what RFC says about that. I guess the hostname domain.net. is valid, but i have no idea how this DNS issue should be treated in SMTP.

[xmail] Re: Local domain and trailing dot

2005-11-09 Thread Sönke Ruempler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tuesday, November 08, 2005 6:41 PM: I dunno exactly what RFC says about that. I guess the hostname domain.net. is valid, but i have no idea how this DNS issue should be treated in SMTP. FYI: Sendmail ignores the trailing dot. Maybe XMail should treat it like

[xmail] Re: Local domain and trailing dot

2005-11-09 Thread Sönke Ruempler
On 09.11.2005 13:10, Francesco Vertova wrote: I think XMail should consider domain.net and domain.net. as equivalent in handling local domains (without having to add lines in domains.tab or aliasdomain.tab). ACK. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body

[xmail] Re: Local domain and trailing dot

2005-11-09 Thread Rob Arends
grin Ack, ack ack ack !! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sönke Ruempler Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 6:41 AM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Re: Local domain and trailing dot On 09.11.2005 13:10, Francesco Vertova

[xmail] Re: Local domain and trailing dot

2005-11-08 Thread Sönke Ruempler
On 08.11.2005 18:17, Francesco Vertova wrote: if I have domain.net in domains.tab and send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note the final dot), domain.net. is not recognized as local, which leads to a mail loop. Can anybody confirm this? Confirmed. If your Mailserver has it's IP or