Hi all,
One problem with using stunnel is that on most platforms all messages will appear to
come from localhost/127.0.0.1 since it will go:
sender - server-stunnel-ssl:465 - server-smtpd-cleartext:25 - rcpt
One thing to watch out for is that if you allow relaying from localhost (almost all
Of decker
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 3:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Wish list
Hi all,
One problem with using stunnel is that on most platforms all messages will
appear to come from localhost/127.0.0.1 since it will go:
sender - server-stunnel-ssl:465 - server-smtpd-cleartext
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Chris L. Franklin wrote:
1. SSL for SMTP
stunnel + XMail
2. SSL for POP3
stunnel + XMail
3. SSL for IMAP (when ever this gets added in)
stunnel + XMail
4. mailproc.tab that can deal with a whole domain and not just a single
user.
custom domains
- Davide
-
--
- Original Message -
From: Davide Libenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 12:18 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Wish list
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Chris L. Franklin wrote:
1. SSL for SMTP
stunnel + XMail
2. SSL for POP3
stunnel + XMail
3. SSL for IMAP
Hello All,
I just released a new script Froz Spool Cleaner. It's designed to reform
commonly malformed froz email. aka emails that are froz and that are missing
the top 3 xmail spool file lines
aka mail from,rcpt to,blank_line.
http://forums.nomadcf.com/viewtopic.php?p=22
-- Chris L.
On Sat, 20 Mar 2004, Chris L. Franklin wrote:
I could use stunnel with xmail, But the whole reason for using XMail VS.
any other MTA.
Is the fact it's a nice all in one package, and I don't have to worry about
making sure I compile it with this hack or patch, Or making sure I have this
