[xmail] Max Message

2005-05-10 Thread Jeffrey L. Conley
I have my max message size set to 1 when someone tries to send an email over this size Outlook continually tries to send the message. Why are the oversized email not rejected. I am running xmail 1.21 on RH 9.0 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body

[xmail] Re: Max Message

2005-05-10 Thread Jeffrey L. Conley
Yes I know, that is not the problem unless I have the setting too high. I really need to know why xmail dosent reject the oversized email. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Spyros Tsiolis Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 2:25 PM To:

[xmail] Re: Max Message

2005-05-10 Thread Sönke Ruempler
Jeffrey L. Conley wrote: Yes I know, that is not the problem unless I have the setting too high. I really need to know why xmail dosent reject the oversized email. As long as the size of the messages inside the mailbox is smaller than your MaxMbSize, XMail will accept incoming messages.

[xmail] Re: Blocking direct delivery

2005-05-10 Thread Snke Ruempler
Helio Cavichiolo Jr wrote: The true is that I already set up SMTP-RDNSCheck, but it blocks only thosewho doesn't have any reverse. I need a set up that also blocks reverse that doesn't match the server name. XMail does not have this feature out of the box. So you'll have to code your own

[xmail] Re: CustMapsList

2005-05-10 Thread Sönke Ruempler
Javier Navarro wrote: Now I am using SMTP after POP3 authentication and my question is: Will my= customers be able to send mail using 0 code (CustMapsList= sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org:0) from a banned IP? Yes - see the manual: ``0'' the connection is kept alive but only authenticated

[xmail] Re: Max Message

2005-05-10 Thread Jeffrey L. Conley
Got it.=20 Thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] = On Behalf Of S=F6nke Ruempler Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 3:27 PM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Re: Max Message Jeffrey L. Conley wrote: =20 Yes I know, that is not the problem

[xmail] Re: Blocking direct delivery

2005-05-10 Thread Sergio Perrone
Exact: You can set up a pre-data filter, look @domain.example in dns against domain.example ip, and reject if you want. Personally, with Checkmailerdomain and SMTP-RDNSCheck in efect I have no problems (almost). Sergio Sönke Ruempler wrote: Helio Cavichiolo Jr wrote: The true is

[xmail] Re: Which comes first auth or rbl?

2005-05-10 Thread Rob Arends
I am fairly sure that RBL is being checked first, and that perhaps for Davide to queue, that, if you authenticate you should be able to bypass the RBL check. Rob :-) _ Signature: Live like you'll die tomorrow! Reply: I tried your signature out

[xmail] Logging

2005-05-10 Thread Freddy
Hi there, Not sure i can be of assistance to Bryn, however... I am running xmail on Windows 2000, I am looking to enable logging on xMail, however other than from command line switch there doesn't seem to be a method of doing it, is there a configuration change i need to make to one of the

[xmail] Re: Logging

2005-05-10 Thread Mike Harrington
The only way to enable logging is through the command line parameters. If you are running it as a service on Win2000 then set the command line arguments through the MAIL_CMD_LINE key in the registry. -Mike - Original Message - From: Freddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: xmail@xmailserver.org

[xmail] Re: Logging

2005-05-10 Thread Brett
On Mon, 9 May 2005, Freddy wrote: Hi there, Not sure i can be of assistance to Bryn, however... I am running xmail on Windows 2000, I am looking to enable logging on xMail, however other than from command line switch there doesn't seem to be a method of doing it, is there a configuration