[xmail] Re: Email address reverse check

2006-10-30 Thread CLEMENT Francis
The program used on the other side to do the 'reverse check' is simple not RFC compliant :) (Does the 'reverse check' an integrated Exim fonctionnality or an add-on ? I don't know ...) The exact RFC mail from syntax IS : MAIL FROM:senderemail IMOO, changing xmail to accept no rfc compliant

[xmail] Re: Email address reverse check

2006-10-30 Thread decker
Hellos, I'm on a different comp than usual so I may be off here since I'm missing the earlier discussion about this. The program used on the other side to do the 'reverse check' is simple not RFC compliant :) (Does the 'reverse check' an integrated Exim fonctionnality or an add-on ? I don't

[xmail] Re: Email address reverse check

2006-10-30 Thread Helio Cavichiolo Jr
Em Sexta 27 Outubro 2006 21:04, Kirk Friggstad escreveu: From http://xmailserver.org/Readme.html#server_tab_variables [AllowNullSender] Enable null sender ('MAIL FROM:') messages to be accepted by XMail. Thanks Kirk, it solved the problem. Helio - To unsubscribe from this list: send the

[xmail] Re: Email address reverse check

2006-10-30 Thread CLEMENT Francis
-Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de decker Envoyé : lundi 30 octobre 2006 12:41 À : xmail@xmailserver.org Objet : [xmail] Re: Email address reverse check Hellos, I'm on a different comp than usual so I may be off here since I'm missing the

[xmail] Re: Local domain and trailing dot

2006-10-30 Thread CLEMENT Francis
I agree with Davide RFC not only apply to MTA but to MUA too and to final users too (programs or humans) :) As the MUA interacts with the user, it's to the MUA responsibility to correct the user (automaticaly or not) if users can't be made RFC compliant ( hard to achieve :) ). Francis

[xmail] Re: Local domain and trailing dot

2006-10-30 Thread Shiloh Jennings
In the business world, end users only care if the recipient received the email they sent. They don't not know or care anything about RFC compliance. I agree RFC compliance is important, but it should not trump the real world concerns of end users. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

[xmail] Re: Local domain and trailing dot

2006-10-30 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Shiloh Jennings wrote: In the business world, end users only care if the recipient received the email they sent. They don't not know or care anything about RFC = compliance. I agree RFC compliance is important, but it should not trump the real = world concerns of

[xmail] Poll ...

2006-10-30 Thread Davide Libenzi
How many would appreciate per-RCPT SMTP filter capabilities? - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[xmail] Re: Poll ...

2006-10-30 Thread John Kielkopf
I would. Davide Libenzi wrote: How many would appreciate per-RCPT SMTP filter capabilities? - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL

[xmail] Re: Poll ...

2006-10-30 Thread Tracy
Oh! Oh! Me! Me! jumps up and down :) Davide Libenzi wrote: How many would appreciate per-RCPT SMTP filter capabilities? - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help

[xmail] Re: Poll ...

2006-10-30 Thread Jeff Buehler
I don't need it right now, but I think it's an excellent idea to add it if it isn't a crazy amount of work. I can easily see needing it in the future... Thanks, Jeff Davide Libenzi wrote: How many would appreciate per-RCPT SMTP filter capabilities? - Davide - To unsubscribe from

[xmail] spam-address.tab size

2006-10-30 Thread Norbert Doeberlein
This is from the XMail Forum: *** Thanks for the script but this file appears to be quite large (18MB), I am wondering if this would cause Xmail to crash or be slow if implemented? After a few minutes running on my main server, about 500 accounts, Xmail stopped

[xmail] Re: spam-address.tab size

2006-10-30 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Norbert Doeberlein wrote: This is from the XMail Forum: *** Thanks for the script but this file appears to be quite large (18MB), I am wondering if this would cause Xmail to crash or be slow if implemented? After a few minutes running

[xmail] Re: spam-address.tab size

2006-10-30 Thread Chad Fleenor
Can't you use the Stearns in the RBL list of the server.tab file? Chad Norbert Doeberlein wrote: This is from the XMail Forum: *** Thanks for the script but this file appears to be quite large (18MB), I am wondering if this would cause Xmail to crash or be slow

[xmail] Re: spam-address.tab size

2006-10-30 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Chad Fleenor wrote: Can't you use the Stearns in the RBL list of the server.tab file? Indeed. Just dump your monster file into a local DNS, and add its entry to the CustMapsList. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of

[xmail] Re: Poll ...

2006-10-30 Thread Filip Supera
Davide Libenzi a écrit : How many would appreciate per-RCPT SMTP filter capabilities? +1 Thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[xmail] Re: spam-address.tab size

2006-10-30 Thread Clive Lansink
I am already using SORBS and I see in the SMTP log that a lot of messages are rejected because of SORBS. But I still get a lot of spam from other servers that SORBS don't seem to know about. I checked on the SORBS web site to see if there is a way to report spammers but I only found

[xmail] Re: Poll ...

2006-10-30 Thread XTechie
Count me in. ~XT Jeff Buehler wrote: I don't need it right now, but I think it's an excellent idea to add it if it isn't a crazy amount of work. I can easily see needing it in the future... Thanks, Jeff Davide Libenzi wrote: How many would appreciate per-RCPT SMTP filter

[xmail] Re: Poll ...

2006-10-30 Thread Chris L. Franklin
me 2 XTechie wrote: Count me in. ~XT Jeff Buehler wrote: I don't need it right now, but I think it's an excellent idea to add it if it isn't a crazy amount of work. I can easily see needing it in the future... Thanks, Jeff Davide Libenzi wrote: How many would appreciate

[xmail] 1.23 changelog ...

2006-10-30 Thread Davide Libenzi
Ok, so far this is what's inside 1.23 changelog: - Check the mailbox size for every message coming into the mailbox (before it was only done during the SMTP phase). - Do not try to send to the 'A' record if the recipient domain does not exist at all (NXDOMAIN). Bounce

[xmail] Re: Poll ...

2006-10-30 Thread Alexander Hagenah
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How many would appreciate per-RCPT SMTP filter capabilities? ++ -- Regards, Alexander Hageganh Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For