On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That sounds pretty good, however, how about my fastcgi question?
I told you the basic
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That sounds pretty good, however, how about my fastcgi question?
Best,
Ree
-
To unsubscribe from
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That sounds pretty good, however, how about my fastcgi question?
I told you the basic architecture, what do you want to know more ?
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all,
Just wondering if anyone has found an elegant way to run a fastcgi type
of filter with xmail under Windows where the executable that is spawned is
a very fast binary that then
Dear all,
Just wondering if anyone has found an elegant way to run a fastcgi type
of filter with xmail under Windows where the executable that is spawned is
a very fast binary that then communicates with a persistent perl
interpreter or script, for instance.
There is some data about doing this
be used with
some modifications, but I think that there would not be too much benefit
to using fastcgi if there was no way to interface to it without launching
a separate process each time.
-Ree
