On 3 Oct 2007, at 9:56, Hal Dell wrote:
Hello All...
Recently a SPAMer started sending eMails to the server using a dictionary
for eMail addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc. Then the
eMail Servers trys to send an eMail message back to the sender indicating
the eMail
Hello All...
Recently a SPAMer started sending eMails to the server using a dictionary
for eMail addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc. Then the
eMail Servers trys to send an eMail message back to the sender indicating
the eMail was
NOT delivered because of a bad eMail
Hi,
Last weekend I had an example of this happen to one of my backup mail servers.
When I noticed the problem there were 27,000 NDR type messages it was
trying to deliver.
Mostly all were sent to random [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the mail server
was diligently trying sending NDR's to every single
Wolfy Wrote @ Wednesday, October 03, 2007 10:37 AM
Last weekend I had an example of this happen to one of my backup mail
servers.
When I noticed the problem there were 27,000 NDR type messages it was
trying to deliver.
Mostly all were sent to random [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the mail server was
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
Hello All...
Recently a SPAMer started sending eMails to the server using a dictionary
for eMail addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc. Then the
eMail Servers trys to send an eMail
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
Hello All...
Recently a SPAMer started sending eMails to the server using a dictionary
for eMail addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc. Then the
eMail Servers trys to send an eMail message back to the sender indicating
the eMail was
Francis Wrote @ Wednesday, October 03, 2007 10:37 AM
Use glst (greylisting) :)
Allmost 99% of these bad connexions will be elliminated, as 99% will =
never retry.
And as glst will first response with a 4xx code, no NDR until second =
attempt connexion accepted by glst.
That is a good
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
Hello All...
Recently a SPAMer started sending eMails to the server using a dictionary
for eMail addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc. Then the
eMail Servers trys to send an eMail message back to the sender indicating
the eMail was
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
Hello All...
Recently a SPAMer started sending eMails to the server using a dictionary
for eMail addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc. Then the
eMail Servers trys to send an eMail
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
Recently a SPAMer started sending eMails to the server using a
dictionary for eMail addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
etc. Then the eMail Servers trys to send an eMail message back to the
sender indicating the eMail was NOT
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
Recently a SPAMer started sending eMails to the server using a
dictionary for eMail addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
etc. Then the eMail Servers trys to send an eMail message back to the
On 4 Oct 2007, at 0:36, K. Wolf wrote:
Hi,
Last weekend I had an example of this happen to one of my backup mail servers.
When I noticed the problem there were 27,000 NDR type messages it was
trying to deliver.
Mostly all were sent to random [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the mail server
was
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
I'm sorry, I should have said that we are running xMail V1.24 at
present -- so I guess I'm saying that our xMail Server V1.24 does NOT
reject the bad destination eMails in the MTA session -- they seem to
get queued for later retry delivery attempts
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
I'm sorry, I should have said that we are running xMail V1.24 at
present -- so I guess I'm saying that our xMail Server V1.24 does NOT
reject the bad destination eMails in the MTA session -- they seem to
get
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 3:54 PM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: Bounced eMail messags
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote:
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Hal Dell wrote
I have a stock V1.24 out of the box -- only filter installed is xbmf.c.
Never heard about xbmf !?!?
No link in xmailserver.org home page in available tools :/
I missed somethink usefull ?
Davide, what is the purpose of this filter ?
Thanks
Francis
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
I have a stock V1.24 out of the box -- only filter installed is xbmf.c.
Never heard about xbmf !?!?
No link in xmailserver.org home page in available tools :/
I missed somethink usefull ?
Davide, what is the purpose of this filter ?
I have a stock V1.24 out of the box -- only filter installed is xbmf.c.
Never heard about xbmf !?!?
No link in xmailserver.org home page in available tools :/
I missed somethink usefull ?
xbmf was developed to deal with the eMail tail null-byte issue and another
liken brethren.
The
18 matches
Mail list logo
