Re: [xmail] XMail 1.27-pre11

2010-01-21 Thread Edinilson - ATINET
...@xmailserver.org To: XMail Users Mailing List xmail@xmailserver.org Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 5:41 PM Subject: Re: [xmail] XMail 1.27-pre11 On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Davide Libenzi wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Edinilson - ATINET wrote: I´m using 1.27-pre01 without problems. Can you see how

Re: [xmail] XMail 1.27-pre11

2010-01-20 Thread CLEMENT Francis
Davide Libenzi Envoyé : mardi 19 janvier 2010 20:50 À : XMail Users Mailing List Objet : Re: [xmail] XMail 1.27-pre11 On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Davide Libenzi wrote: On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Edinilson - ATINET wrote: ..NET 3.5 will not run in Windows 2000 Server... What can we, Windows 2000 users

Re: [xmail] XMail 1.27-pre11

2010-01-20 Thread Edinilson - ATINET
-Professional Web Hosting Tel Voz: (0xx11) 4412-0876 http://www.atinet.com.br - Original Message - From: CLEMENT Francis fclem...@adour-bureau.com To: 'XMail Users Mailing List' xmail@xmailserver.org Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 6:00 AM Subject: Re: [xmail] XMail 1.27-pre11 I think

Re: [xmail] XMail 1.27-pre11

2010-01-20 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, CLEMENT Francis wrote: Seems to be a similar problem like ERDNS weirdness thread on the nettest tool and the getnameinfo entry point no found in dinamic link library WS2_32.dll on w2000 os :/ This could help Davide if the same 'problem' That function has been used by

Re: [xmail] XMail 1.27-pre11

2010-01-20 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Edinilson - ATINET wrote: After installing VC++ 2008 redistributables, the following error is being returned when trying to start xmail: The procedure entry point freeaddrinfo could not be located in the dynamic link library WS2_32.dll Well, ther is a big clue here:

Re: [xmail] XMail 1.27-pre11

2010-01-20 Thread Edinilson - ATINET
xmail@xmailserver.org Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 3:25 PM Subject: Re: [xmail] XMail 1.27-pre11 On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Edinilson - ATINET wrote: After installing VC++ 2008 redistributables, the following error is being returned when trying to start xmail: The procedure entry point

Re: [xmail] XMail 1.27-pre11

2010-01-20 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Edinilson - ATINET wrote: I´m using 1.27-pre01 without problems. Can you see how pre14 works for you? http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.27-pre12.tar.gz http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.27-pre12.win32bin.zip This is same as pre12 for Unix users. - Davide

Re: [xmail] XMail 1.27-pre11

2010-01-20 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Davide Libenzi wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Edinilson - ATINET wrote: I´m using 1.27-pre01 without problems. Can you see how pre14 works for you? http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.27-pre12.tar.gz http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.27-pre12.win32bin.zip OK,

[xmail] XMail 1.27-pre11

2010-01-19 Thread Davide Libenzi
Here are the links: http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.27-pre11.tar.gz http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.27-pre11.win32bin.zip The ChangeLog is inside the archives, as usual. This release fixes a lng lines mishandling that was triggered by Yahoo! header composer. - Davide

Re: [xmail] XMail 1.27-pre11

2010-01-19 Thread Edinilson - ATINET
-0876 http://www.atinet.com.br - Original Message - From: Davide Libenzi davi...@xmailserver.org To: XMail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 3:36 PM Subject: [xmail] XMail 1.27-pre11 Here are the links: http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.27-pre11.tar.gz

Re: [xmail] XMail 1.27-pre11

2010-01-19 Thread fred
Mailing List Subject: Re: [xmail] XMail 1.27-pre11 Importance: High Davide, do Windows users need to download some dll somewhere? I´m asking because, trying to run this version, a window popup is opened telling that a dll is missing. Thanks Edinilson

Re: [xmail] XMail 1.27-pre11

2010-01-19 Thread fred
...@xmailserver.org To: XMail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 3:36 PM Subject: [xmail] XMail 1.27-pre11 Here are the links: http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.27-pre11.tar.gz http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.27-pre11.win32bin.zip The ChangeLog is inside

Re: [xmail] XMail 1.27-pre11

2010-01-19 Thread Edinilson - ATINET
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 5:03 PM Subject: Re: [xmail] XMail 1.27-pre11 You should at least specify the name of the DLL ;) I guess this is OpenSSL, you should install the latest version. -Original Message- From: xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org [mailto:xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org

Re: [xmail] XMail 1.27-pre11

2010-01-19 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Edinilson - ATINET wrote: MSVCR90.dll Hmmm, probably this? http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=AB99342F-5D1A-413D-8319-81DA479AB0D7displaylang=en - Davide ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org

Re: [xmail] XMail 1.27-pre11

2010-01-19 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, fred wrote: Davided, Do you have an idea of when 1.27 is going to be released? I am asking because since pre1 there are lots of fixes and I am thinking of updating my servers soon, I will wait if you are planning to release it soon. Let's give pre11 till the end of

Re: [xmail] XMail 1.27-pre11

2010-01-19 Thread Edinilson - ATINET
Libenzi davi...@xmailserver.org To: XMail Users Mailing List xmail@xmailserver.org Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 5:16 PM Subject: Re: [xmail] XMail 1.27-pre11 On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Edinilson - ATINET wrote: MSVCR90.dll Hmmm, probably this? http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId

Re: [xmail] XMail 1.27-pre11

2010-01-19 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Edinilson - ATINET wrote: ..NET 3.5 will not run in Windows 2000 Server... What can we, Windows 2000 users, do ? Will build using VC 8 ... - Davide ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org

Re: [xmail] XMail 1.27-pre11

2010-01-19 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Davide Libenzi wrote: On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Edinilson - ATINET wrote: ..NET 3.5 will not run in Windows 2000 Server... What can we, Windows 2000 users, do ? Will build using VC 8 ... Which will use such DLL too. MSVC 2005 does not, but I don't have that anymore.