Re: [xmail] xmail bug: filter return codes wrong

2013-05-25 Thread U.Mutlu
Subject: Re: [xmail] xmail bug: filter return codes wrong There is only one flag value, 16, it's optional and means to stop processing any further filters in the chain, ie. an early-break signal. I mainly mean the SMPT message filters. Are the return values 4, 5, 6 (plus +16 to them) not used

Re: [xmail] xmail bug: filter return codes wrong

2013-05-24 Thread Edinilson - ATINET
-- ATINET Tel Voz: (0xx11) 4412-0876 http://www.atinet.com.br - Original Message - From: U.Mutlu um4...@mutluit.com To: xmail@xmailserver.org Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 12:54 PM Subject: [xmail] xmail bug: filter return codes wrong The xmail documentation says

Re: [xmail] xmail bug: filter return codes wrong

2013-05-24 Thread U.Mutlu
fine for years. Regards Edinilson -- ATINET Tel Voz: (0xx11) 4412-0876 http://www.atinet.com.br - Original Message - From: U.Mutlu um4...@mutluit.com To: xmail@xmailserver.org Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 12:54 PM Subject: [xmail] xmail bug: filter

Re: [xmail] xmail bug: filter return codes wrong

2013-05-24 Thread Edinilson - ATINET
...@mutluit.com To: XMail Users Mailing List xmail@xmailserver.org Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 10:18 AM Subject: Re: [xmail] xmail bug: filter return codes wrong There is only one flag value, 16, it's optional and means to stop processing any further filters in the chain, ie. an early-break signal. I

[xmail] xmail bug: filter return codes wrong

2013-05-23 Thread U.Mutlu
The xmail documentation says: If this filters returns '4, 5 or 6' the message is rejected and is stopped in its travel. If the filter modifies the message it must return '7'. But, this info seems to be totally wrong, as only 0 and 3 is working (plus adding 16 to it for stopping processing