On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:23:56PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 09:43 +1100, garrone wrote:
Using the intel driver on a GM45 device, with monitors
connected to the TMDS1/2 outputs, it was found that
the xserver was refusing to accept the option
option
Version 1.2.99.3 improvements over 1.2.99.1:
- Panning support
- Output primary support
Version 1.2.99.1 improvements over 1.2.2:
- Transformation support
- GetScreenResourcesCurrent support
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/releases/individual/proto/randrproto-1.2.99.3.tar.gz
MD5:
Version 1.2.99.3 improvements over 1.2.99.1:
- Panning support
- Output primary support
Version 1.2.99.1 improvements over 1.2.3:
- Transformation support
- GetScreenResourcesCurrent support
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/releases/individual/lib/libXrandr-1.2.99.3.tar.gz
MD5:
Hi,
We're trying to get an Ubuntu 8.04.1 system running based on the Intel
Atom based motherboard D945GCLF. This will use the VLC plugin to Firefox
to play mpeg files which, with the player configured to output via X11
and having DRI enabled seems to do a fine job. HOWEVER we also want to
2008/12/12 Cliff Lawson cl...@amshold.com
So I used GIT to get a libdrm that did include the linux-source part of the
tree but when I built it the i915.ko did not build and looking at the
Makefile it would appear to be because OS_HAS_GEM was not defined. It was a
search for the solution to
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:23:51 -, Clemens Eisserer
linuxhi...@gmail.com wrote:
From the plain X Server POV, antialiasing is always going to be hard,
because to do it you need to know the background color or pixmap, and
the
Xserver does not keep track of how you had earlier set it, so
And that is no problem at all, until you want to throw away the glyph that
was there before and write a new glyph in its place.
How? How do you 'remove' a glyph that was there before? There's no
'remove this pixmap' operation.
___
xorg mailing list
On Friday 12 December 2008, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Friday 12 December 2008, Matthias Hopf wrote:
Announcing the 1.2.4 of the xf86-video-radeonhd driver.
RadeonHD is the X.org X11 driver for AMD GPG (ATI) r5xx/r6xx chipsets.
The development is driven by Novell at the time of writing, together
with
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net wrote:
On Friday 12 December 2008, Matthias Hopf wrote:
Announcing the 1.2.4 of the xf86-video-radeonhd driver.
I still don't have drm, so glxgears is only marginally faster (850 fps vs 800)
than before on an RV610 (Diamond
Hello,
I'm having trouble to get DRI to work:
LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose glxinfo | grep direct
libGL error: XF86DRIQueryDirectRenderingCapable returned false
direct rendering: No (If you want to find out why, try setting
LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose)
I think the problem is here:
Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote:
Should I be able to get my HP lp2475w monitor to work with DisplayPort
on Fedora 10 using the intel driver on a HP DC7900? Nothing seems to
work at all... I don't think the DisplayPort is even recognized.
I have xorg-x11-drv-i810-2.5.0-4.fc10.x86_64.
X.Org
Hi
Just wanted to raise the awareness of this bug:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19048
which is the only one keeping me from uploading it to the ubuntu devel
release before alpha2 next week ;)
t
___
xorg mailing list
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Hendrik Friedel hen_m...@web.de wrote:
Hello,
I'm having trouble to get DRI to work:
LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose glxinfo | grep direct
libGL error: XF86DRIQueryDirectRenderingCapable returned false
direct rendering: No (If you want to find out why, try setting
Richard Schwarting aquari...@gmail.com writes:
Hey. The patches cured XAA slowness for me and obviate the need for
the UseBIOS NO option for both EXA and XAA for me. Hurrah.
I mentioned before that after suspending in Fedora, resuming gives me
a blank screen. If I do any VT switches, than
Hello,
No, it's not. If I load it I get this error:
fglrx: module license 'Proprietary. (C) 2002 - ATI Technologies, Starnberg,
GERMANY' taints kernel.
[fglrx] Maximum main memory to use for locked dma buffers: 927 MBytes.
[fglrx] ASYNCIO init succeed!
[fglrx] PAT is enabled successfully!
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Hendrik Friedel hen_m...@web.de wrote:
Hello,
No, it's not. If I load it I get this error:
fglrx: module license 'Proprietary. (C) 2002 - ATI Technologies, Starnberg,
GERMANY' taints kernel.
[fglrx] Maximum main memory to use for locked dma buffers: 927
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 14:11 -0500, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote:
Should I be able to get my HP lp2475w monitor to work with DisplayPort
on Fedora 10 using the intel driver on a HP DC7900? Nothing seems to
work at all... I don't think the DisplayPort is even recognized.
For G45/GM45, the
2008/12/12 Hendrik Friedel hen_m...@web.de:
Hello Beso,
Thanks for your strong support.
I'll try to answer your points:
1) Sorry, but I don't know when the libdrm modules are compiled. I've not
compiled a new kernel on this installation, so if the modules are compiled
with the kernel, then
And that is no problem at all, until you want to throw away the glyph that
was there before and write a new glyph in its place. And then you need to
know what the original background behind the old glyph was, but the server
does not have that information, and so it has to be kept in the
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:12:38PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
I just wasted quite some time to get master to actually start. Unresolved
symbols all over the place, both with intel and with vesa. Vesa had
xf86InterpretEDID, intel had three or four different ones (miPolyRectangle
was one of
Peter Hutterer wrote:
I just wasted quite some time to get master to actually start.
Unresolved
symbols all over the place, both with intel and with vesa. Vesa had
xf86InterpretEDID, intel had three or four different ones
(miPolyRectangle
was one of them IIRC). Rebuilding with and without
21 matches
Mail list logo
