On 02/17/2010 12:21 AM, ext Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 09:58:39AM +0100, Bradley T. Hughes wrote:
On 02/16/2010 03:10 AM, ext Peter Hutterer wrote:
The problem is not about FireFox. With some effort you can fix it there.
But what about close source software such as Opera?
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 07:26:35AM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:21:28 +0100, Luc Verhaegen l...@skynet.be wrote:
Can we get some more details here please? Alanc also mentioned ssl
certificates, FOSDEM 2010 and Videohackfest from the top of his head.
We haven't paid
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 08:13 +0200, Matthew Fincham wrote:
On 17-02-10 07:57, Matthew Fincham wrote:
On 16-02-10 17:27, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 14:17 +0200, Matthew Fincham wrote:
On 16-02-10 11:29, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 01:05:14PM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Chris Ball wrote:
expo (the 2U machine) was there originally, and this serves the
needs of *.x.org fairly well. The 3U machines were donated by
Sun and were earmarked for backup, redundancy, sharing fd.o
Here are the results of my quick survey of Window Managers present in
Debian/Stable. That is the same Debian that has the Xorg server with
classic dualhead effectively removed.
The goal is to see how practical xrandr is for dual-screen purposes,
today.
I started the X11 server with 1400x1050
Martin Cracauer, le Wed 17 Feb 2010 09:45:25 -0500, a écrit :
Before I pass final verdict, what would be involved in -say- hacking
up fvwm2 to deal with xrandr?
Note
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=395500
Actually you just need to restart fvwm to make it notice the new
I have a problem with keyboard LEDs: they don't work under X Window
System. They don't turn on when I press Caps Lock, Num Lock or Scroll
Lock. But they do work under virtualizers like VMware or QEMU (If I
press Num Lock, the Num Lock LED will turn on under VMware, but not
under real
Martin Cracauer:
Overall my original impression has been reinforced: you basically
dropped what hackers need when getting work done on a desktop Unix
machine in favor of what managerish types coming from Windows need
when standing in front of a projector and need to get their
single-task
Martin Cracauer wrote:
Here are the results of my quick survey of Window Managers present in
Debian/Stable. That is the same Debian that has the Xorg server with
classic dualhead effectively removed.
Isn't classic dualhead removed by the specific drivers? I didn't
think anything had
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Martin Cracauer craca...@cons.org wrote:
Here are the results of my quick survey of Window Managers present in
Debian/Stable. That is the same Debian that has the Xorg server with
classic dualhead effectively removed.
The goal is to see how practical xrandr
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 10:30 +0200, Nameer Yarkon wrote:
Hi,
Does X11 still uses /dev/mem to directly manipulate the physical memory ?
strace would tell you. The answer is it depends though. On Linux,
most memory access goes through the PCI BAR resource files in sysfs, but
there are some
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Adam Jackson a...@nwnk.net wrote:
most memory access goes through the PCI BAR resource files in sysfs, but
i was expecting that if /dev/mem was abonded, then you will probably
have to call mmap() on a DRM specific driver node to get the mapping
you require.
how
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Martin Cracauer craca...@cons.org wrote:
Alan Coopersmith wrote on Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 07:34:01AM -0800:
Martin Cracauer wrote:
Here are the results of my quick survey of Window Managers present in
Debian/Stable. That is the same Debian that has the Xorg
Alex Deucher wrote on Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:35:37AM -0500:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Martin Cracauer craca...@cons.org wrote:
Here are the results of my quick survey of Window Managers present in
Debian/Stable. ?That is the same Debian that has the Xorg server with
classic
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 05:54:18PM +0200, Nameer Yarkon wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Adam Jackson a...@nwnk.net wrote:
most memory access goes through the PCI BAR resource files in sysfs, but
i was expecting that if /dev/mem was abonded, then you will probably
have to call mmap()
Martin Cracauer, le Wed 17 Feb 2010 10:50:12 -0500, a écrit :
Thanks for the fvwm2 tip, I'll try that later. Of course it won't do
anything about the other client problems and the virtual desktop
switching.
Note that virtual desktop switching is handled by fvwm2 too. Initially
I thought
Samuel Thibault wrote on Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 05:10:19PM +0100:
Martin Cracauer, le Wed 17 Feb 2010 10:50:12 -0500, a ?crit :
Thanks for the fvwm2 tip, I'll try that later. Of course it won't do
anything about the other client problems and the virtual desktop
switching.
Note that
Samuel Thibault wrote on Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 05:29:12PM +0100:
Martin Cracauer, le Wed 17 Feb 2010 11:17:52 -0500, a ?crit :
Apart from that, in the movie situation wouldn't clients that open
dialog boxes in the middle of what they think is the screen obscure
parts of the movie at random
After writing a somewhat functional xorg driver for the OAK Spitfire
OTI64111 video card, I am trying to modify the driver to support the
OTI64107 video card, which I have plugged in my test machine. The first
strange thing that I notice about this card is that it reports a MMIO
region that is
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org wrote:
What's your real question? i.e. what problem are you trying to solve?
I'm trying to understand how user space can efficiently manipulate
physical memory, and I'm sure that X11 does that great. So this is
just a learning
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Martin Cracauer craca...@cons.org wrote:
Alex Deucher wrote on Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:35:37AM -0500:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Martin Cracauer craca...@cons.org wrote:
Here are the results of my quick survey of Window Managers present in
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:38:18 -0500
Martin Cracauer craca...@cons.org wrote:
Samuel Thibault wrote on Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 05:29:12PM +0100:
Martin Cracauer, le Wed 17 Feb 2010 11:17:52 -0500, a ?crit :
Apart from that, in the movie situation wouldn't clients that open
dialog boxes in
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 12:13 -0500, Alex Villacís Lasso wrote:
After writing a somewhat functional xorg driver for the OAK Spitfire
OTI64111 video card, I am trying to modify the driver to support the
OTI64107 video card, which I have plugged in my test machine. The first
strange thing that
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 19:29 +0200, Nameer Yarkon wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org wrote:
What's your real question? i.e. what problem are you trying to solve?
I'm trying to understand how user space can efficiently manipulate
physical memory, and I'm
Doh. Those buttons now appear to be named Update Your
Info and Update, respectively. I hadn't realized they
had been renamed; my apologies for the confusion.
Bart
In message c1299894-b4f1-4286-9ae2-e97266b3f...@freedesktop.org you wrote:
On Oct 13, 2009, at 20:07, Barton C Massey
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 07:04, Peter Vypov peter.vy...@gmail.com wrote:
I have installed xorg-xserver version 1.4.2 and all the LEDs now work.
Problem fixed. Sérgio, Daniel, thank you! (I also tried xorg-xserver
1.4.99.906, but it wanted newer glproto for some reason).
The .99 releases are
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 18:04 +0300, Peter Vypov wrote:
(I also tried xorg-xserver
1.4.99.906, but it wanted newer glproto for some reason).
1.4.99.906 is an 1.5 RC
1.4 = X.org 7.3
1.5 = X.org 7.4
1.7 = X.org 7.5
Why you want an xserver 1.5 RC ?
Regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
smime.p7s
Hi,
Last time I looked at OSUOSL for hosting, they wouldn't let
people have root on hosted machines -- do you know if that's
still the case?
That's a good question. I know at least one admin, warthog9, has
full control of his machines. I think it varies depending on the
28 matches
Mail list logo
