On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 01:27:49AM +0100, Stephan Raue wrote:
[3904117.243] (EE) intel(0): Failed to submit batch buffer, expect
rendering corruption or even a frozen display: Bad file descriptor.
[3904117.277] (WW) intel(0): flip queue failed: Device or resource busy
[3904117.277] (WW)
Howdy,
A few days ago I submitted a request for help regarding the problems I'm having
with X11 on my system. I have heard nothing from anyone in this regard.
Am I on the wrong list?
Please help me.
Regards,
George...
It's not what you know that hurts you, It's what you know that ain't
i use also linux-2.6.33-rc8.
do you had also issues with output with this issue?
Am 20.02.2010 12:05, schrieb Mikael Eriksson:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 01:27:49AM +0100, Stephan Raue wrote:
[3904117.243] (EE) intel(0): Failed to submit batch buffer, expect
rendering corruption or even a
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:10:07 -0600
Jesse W. Hathaway je...@mbuki-mvuki.org wrote:
Martin Cracauer:
Overall my original impression has been reinforced: you basically
dropped what hackers need when getting work done on a desktop Unix
machine in favor of what managerish types coming from
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:35:14 -0500
Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
The number of zaphod users is relatively
small and the amount of developer resources to support it is
relatively high. More people want to be able to use and dynamically
switch between all their connectors than want
On 17 Feb 2010, Adam Jackson said:
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 10:30 +0200, Nameer Yarkon wrote:
Hi,
Does X11 still uses /dev/mem to directly manipulate the physical memory ?
strace would tell you. The answer is it depends though. On Linux,
most memory access goes through the PCI BAR resource
a so useful thing like the zaphod mode with relatively small users ? in my
opinion
i don't think that , in my case i used have it for run my media center in
0.1 and the normal desktop in 0.0 so i can still watch my media while some
friends or somebody chat or surf without interfece , i can't do
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 17:40:16 -0400
E0x samud...@gmail.com wrote:
a so useful thing like the zaphod mode with relatively small users ? in my
opinion
i don't think that , in my case i used have it for run my media center in
0.1 and the normal desktop in 0.0 so i can still watch my media while
Attached please find my report on The State of the X.Org
Foundation, as required by the Bylaws of the Foundation.
Many thanks to all who have participated in the development
of X.Org.
Bart Massey
Secretary, X.Org Foundation Board
b...@cs.pdx.edu
The State of The X.Org Foundation
The 2010 X.Org Foundation Board elections are now complete.
54 members cast votes from an active membership of 144. The
final results in Borda Count points [1] were:
Alex Deucher141
Keith Packard 120
Matthieu Herrb 118
Matthias Hopf 102
Eric
On 2/21/10 12:01 AM, Barton C Massey wrote:
The Google/X.Org Summer of Code 2009 was successful,
with three of four accepted projects completing and
contributing to X.Org development, as well as helping to
bring new developers to X.Org [2]. The X.Org Endless
Vacation
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 23:07:18 +0100
Florian Mickler flor...@mickler.org wrote:
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 17:40:16 -0400
E0x samud...@gmail.com wrote:
a so useful thing like the zaphod mode with relatively small users ? in my
opinion
i don't think that , in my case i used have it for run my
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 15:38, Tomas Carnecky t...@dbservice.com wrote:
On 2/21/10 12:01 AM, Barton C Massey wrote:
The Google/X.Org Summer of Code 2009 was successful,
with three of four accepted projects completing and
contributing to X.Org development, as well as helping to
In message 4b807266.8020...@dbservice.com you wrote:
On 2/21/10 12:01 AM, Barton C Massey wrote:
The X.Org Endless
Vacation of Code was established in 2009 to provide
opportunities similar to Summer of Code to selected
students on an ad hoc calendar. Only a couple of
students have
14 matches
Mail list logo
