Re: The State of The X.Org Foundation 2010

2010-02-25 Thread Matthias Hopf
On Feb 20, 10 15:01:50 -0800, Barton C Massey wrote: The 2009 Board election was once again delayed, and completed in mid-February 2010. This is unfortunate, and further work needs to be done to ensure that the 2010 and ongoing elections can be held in a timely and

Re: The State of The X.Org Foundation 2010

2010-02-25 Thread Barton C Massey
In message 20100225105531.ga26...@suse.de you wrote: On Feb 20, 10 15:01:50 -0800, Barton C Massey wrote: The 2009 Board election was once again delayed, and completed in mid-February 2010. This is unfortunate, and further work needs to be done to ensure that the 2010 and

Re: Paypal stealing from Xorg [was: Re: Board voting ends today, but...]

2010-02-25 Thread Egbert Eich
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 07:19:26PM +, Steffen Schaumburg wrote: I propose the following actions: - Unless it's definitely a complete waste of time civil as well as criminal charges should be brought by Xorg against eBay, as far as this is possible without undue costs or risks to Xorg.

X server slow to start

2010-02-25 Thread William Wagner
Hi All, First I hope this is the correct list to post to, if not then please point me in the right direction. I am trying to get the X.Org xserver running on an x86 platform with intel 945GME graphics. It is for an embedded motherboard

Re: X server slow to start

2010-02-25 Thread Pat Kane
I would use strace to get a low-level view of what is going on. When the X server is in that 20 second state run: strace -tt -f -p PID_OF_X if it is not busy doing system calls then you might need to connect to the Xorg using gdb and then step to see what is going on: gdb -p PID_OF_X Pat

xserver + radeon + latest git kernel = crash and burn with startx

2010-02-25 Thread Justin Mattock
this is new: kernel: [ 92.899961] pci :01:00.0: PCI INT A - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 16 [ 93.019936] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 [ 93.097704] [drm] radeon defaulting to userspace modesetting. [ 93.100104] [drm] Initialized radeon 1.32.0 20080528 for :01:00.0 on minor 0

FTBFS with selinux enabled

2010-02-25 Thread Harald Braumann
Hi, xserver fails to build, if selinux is enabled (git master as of today). Affected are all the servers, except xfree86 (hw/{dmx,kdrive,vfb,xnest}, didn't test quartz and xwin). The problem seems to be, that the linker flag for selinux is missing. If I add -lselinux to *_LDADD in the

Re: FTBFS with selinux enabled

2010-02-25 Thread Eamon Walsh
On 02/25/2010 06:31 PM, Harald Braumann wrote: Hi, xserver fails to build, if selinux is enabled (git master as of today). Affected are all the servers, except xfree86 (hw/{dmx,kdrive,vfb,xnest}, didn't test quartz and xwin). The problem seems to be, that the linker flag for selinux is

[PATCH] This fixes an error with compiling the xserver with SELinux enabled.

2010-02-25 Thread Justin P. Mattock
Latest HEAD fails to build with SELinux enabled. Below is a fix that worked for me. not sure if its legit or not(please look and review). libpixman-1.so /usr/lib/libXdmcp.so /usr/lib/libaudit.so -lwrap -lm -lrt ../../Xext/.libs/libXext.a(xselinux_ext.o): In function `SELinuxExtensionInit':

Re: FTBFS with selinux enabled

2010-02-25 Thread Justin P. mattock
On 02/25/2010 04:40 PM, Eamon Walsh wrote: On 02/25/2010 06:31 PM, Harald Braumann wrote: Hi, xserver fails to build, if selinux is enabled (git master as of today). Affected are all the servers, except xfree86 (hw/{dmx,kdrive,vfb,xnest}, didn't test quartz and xwin). The problem seems to be,