On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
but then we got distracted
Pretty much sums up the state of the intel driver from August 2006 to present.
-jwb
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Thomas Jaeger thjae...@gmail.com wrote:
You really need the glyph cache in the X server to get decent text
performance out of the 2.5 intel driver. The patches are pretty
straightforward to backport, but it is my understanding that a 1.6
server will be
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 2:26 AM, Michel Dänzer
mic...@tungstengraphics.com wrote:
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 10:57 +0100, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 06:48:52PM -0500, Thomas Jaeger wrote:
You really need the glyph cache in the X server to get decent text
performance out of the
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote:
Is your CPU pegged during the slow performance period? If so, you need
to run sysprof to see what the problem is.
Yes, Xorg gets one entire CPU and then some.
(Yes, oprofile generally isn't good enough to get decent
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote:
Is your CPU pegged during the slow performance period? If so, you need
to run sysprof to see what the problem is.
1.3MB output of sysprof at the following URL:
http://octothorpe.barelyconnected.net/~jwb/sysprof-scrolling.txt
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Thomas Jaeger thjae...@gmail.com wrote:
You really need the glyph cache in the X server to get decent text
performance out of the 2.5 intel driver. The patches are pretty
straightforward to backport, but it is my understanding that a 1.6
server will be
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote:
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 16:08 -0800, Jeffrey Baker wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Thomas Jaeger thjae...@gmail.com wrote:
You really need the glyph cache in the X server to get decent text
performance out of the 2.5
