Re: Pointer glide patch for Input/synaptics

it would take a specific set of circumstances and may not be very noticeable. Cheers, -Matt Helsley ___ xorg mailing list xorg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg

Re: [PATCH] Xi: define a default range of axis labels.

AXIS_LABEL_PROP_ABS_VOLUME Abs Volume +#define AXIS_LABEL_PROP_ABS_MISCAbs Misc + #endif A nit: Rel and Abs may be abbreviations end-users wouldn't recognize. Perhaps expanding them would be good. Cheers, -Matt Helsley ___ xorg mailing list xorg

Re: Draft XI 2 protocol specification

in the future :). Cheers, -Matt Helsley - am I heading down a dead end? No. \o/ - is it beer o'clock yet? dani...@hyperdub:~% date Mon Jan 19 06:26:55 EST 2009 Hmm. Cheers, Daniel ___ xorg mailing list xorg

Re: [RFC][PATCH] General axis valuator support

On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote: Some comments purely related to your comments, not your code. I won't be able to look at your code today. On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 07:37:49PM -0800, Matt Helsley wrote: Currently X, Y, and PRESSURE are special

Re: [PATCH] evdev: Array sizes and iterations off by one

On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 10:42 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:05:12PM -0800, Matt Helsley wrote: ABS_CNT (and friends) need to be used in some places instead of ABS_MAX. Also NBITS seems misnamed -- it is really the number of longs needed to hold the specified number

[PATCH] rename NBITS to NLONGS to reflect its actual meaning

NBITS really convers the number of bits passed as its argument into a number of longs. This is somewhat atypical of many function-like-macro names. Rename it to NLONGS. Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley matt.hels...@gmail.com --- src/evdev.c | 16 src/evdev.h | 14

[PATCH] Fix FOO_MAX off-by-one

with Linux kernels which lack them. Use FOO_CNT whenever we need to know the number of bits needed -- usually to calculate the number of longs needed. When iterating over the values FOO_MAX still seems appropriate however the loop test should include FOO_MAX rather than skip it. Signed-off-by: Matt

[RFC][PATCH] General axis valuator support

converting the REL axes should be a separate patch. Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley matt.hels...@gmail.com --- src/evdev.c | 189 +--- src/evdev.h |9 +- 2 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-) Index: xf86-input-evdev/src/evdev.c

Re: [RFC][PATCH] General axis valuator support

On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 19:37 -0800, Matt Helsley wrote: Currently X, Y, and PRESSURE are special case axes in xf86-input-evdev. This patch supports axes in a more general way. There are a few open questions and TODOs: TODO: Add REL axes. Since we currently limit evdev devices

[PATCH] evdev: Array sizes and iterations off by one

ABS_CNT (and friends) need to be used in some places instead of ABS_MAX. Also NBITS seems misnamed -- it is really the number of longs needed to hold the specified number of bits. Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley matt.hels...@gmail.com --- src/evdev.c | 24 src/evdev.h

[PATCH] evdev: Add presure valuator (v2)

If it's available report pressure. Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley matt.hels...@gmail.com --- Changes: Renamed pressure_valuator to has_pressure. Nested some code blocks rather than having separate nearly identical blocks. Use xf86PostMotionEventP instead

[RFC][PATCH] xf86-input-evdev: add pressure valuator

If it available report pressure as the third valuator. Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley matt.hels...@gmail.com --- I couldn't seem to get the third valuator from X with xf86-input-evdev master when I was testing this over the holidays. (tested using the GIMP) So I backported to an older version