Re: [ANNOUNCE] xcalc 1.0.4

2010-11-27 Thread Gaetan Nadon
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 12:25 -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote: We just pass through install-sh from the autotools - certainly I am using newer versions of those in current releases than I did last year - right now I'm building releases with: autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.68 automake

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xcalc 1.0.4

2010-11-27 Thread Dan Nicholson
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote: Somchai Smythe wrote: I compared it to the install-sh in xcalc-1.0.3 and it seems random lines were deleted from the case statement. -    -g) chgrpcmd=$chgrpprog $2 *sigh*   I see what happened now - the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xcalc 1.0.4

2010-11-26 Thread Somchai Smythe
Hello list, Am I doing something wrong? The install-sh seems to be broken now: make install-strip DESTDIR=/tmp/package-xcalc V=1 make INSTALL_PROGRAM=/bin/sh /tmp/xcalc-1.0.4/install-sh -c -s \ install_sh_PROGRAM=/bin/sh /tmp/xcalc-1.0.4/install-sh -c -s INSTALL_STRIP_FLAG=-s \

app-xcalc 1.0.4: install-sh fails on install-strip target - Was:Re: [ANNOUNCE] xcalc 1.0.4

2010-11-26 Thread Gaetan Nadon
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 22:00 +0700, Somchai Smythe wrote: Hello list, Am I doing something wrong? The install-sh seems to be broken now: I can reproduce the problem. Simply invoking make install-strip will do it. I don't know the root cause of the problem, but a workaround is to autoreconf

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xcalc 1.0.4

2010-11-26 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Somchai Smythe wrote: Hello list, Am I doing something wrong? The install-sh seems to be broken now: I compared it to the install-sh in xcalc-1.0.3 and it seems random lines were deleted from the case statement. We just pass through install-sh from the autotools - certainly I am using

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xcalc 1.0.4

2010-11-26 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Somchai Smythe wrote: I compared it to the install-sh in xcalc-1.0.3 and it seems random lines were deleted from the case statement. --g) chgrpcmd=$chgrpprog $2 *sigh* I see what happened now - the lines deleted are very much not random - they're the lines with $ in, due to my use of

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xcalc 1.0.4

2010-11-26 Thread Jeremy Huddleston
And here I thought this might've been because the git repos were compromised... duck / ... too soon? On Nov 26, 2010, at 16:42, Alan Coopersmith wrote: Somchai Smythe wrote: I compared it to the install-sh in xcalc-1.0.3 and it seems random lines were deleted from the case statement. -

[ANNOUNCE] xcalc 1.0.4

2010-11-24 Thread Alan Coopersmith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 xcalc is a Xaw-toolkit based scientific calculator X11 client that can emulate a TI-30 or an HP-10C. This minor maintenance release provides the usual recent collection of improvements to the calculation of the build configuration and other

[ANNOUNCE] xcalc 1.0.4

2010-11-24 Thread Alan Coopersmith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 xcalc is a Xaw-toolkit based scientific calculator X11 client that can emulate a TI-30 or an HP-10C. This minor maintenance release provides the usual recent collection of improvements to the calculation of the build configuration and other