Re: [RFC] Xorg symbols that should not be public

2008-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 12:36:01AM -0200, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: In my Linux x86 computer, using only git master, and with X Server configured with --prefix=/usr --disable-builtin-fonts --enable-dri2 --enable-dri --enable-xephyr With all buildable modules also installed,

Re: [RFC] Xorg symbols that should not be public

2008-12-09 Thread Aaron Plattner
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 02:46:15AM -0200, Paulo C?sar Pereira de Andrade wrote: Hi Aaron, Can you test with a install of the current X Server git master, and check what symbols are missing if any? Just use the script attached. Nifty script! I took the liberty of making it print out the

[RFC] Xorg symbols that should not be public

2008-12-08 Thread Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
Hi, In my Linux x86 computer, using only git master, and with X Server configured with --prefix=/usr --disable-builtin-fonts --enable-dri2 --enable-dri --enable-xephyr With all buildable modules also installed, attached is the list of symbols that are not used by any module. There are 2

Re: [RFC] Xorg symbols that should not be public

2008-12-08 Thread Aaron Plattner
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 12:36:01AM -0200, Paulo C?sar Pereira de Andrade wrote: Hi, In my Linux x86 computer, using only git master, and with X Server configured with --prefix=/usr --disable-builtin-fonts --enable-dri2 --enable-dri --enable-xephyr With all buildable modules also

Re: [RFC] Xorg symbols that should not be public

2008-12-08 Thread Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
Aaron Plattner wrote: I think some private headers, for things like libextmod, libxaa, libfb, etc, should be created, still with symbols exported at first, to guarantee binary compatibility. But some symbols that are currently exported should be made private, and not advertised in the sdk,