On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Hi Alan,
in your mail starting this thread
If someone wanted to organize a janitorial squad to tackle these and
help
new people work through them to get to the point where they were ready
for
commit access, we'd love you forever (or at least
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Hi Alan,
in your mail starting this thread
If someone wanted to organize a janitorial squad to tackle these and help
new people work through them to get to the point where they were ready for
commit access, we'd love you forever (or at least until
Peter Breitenlohner wrote:
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
If someone wanted to organize a janitorial squad to tackle these
and help
new people work through them to get to the point where they were
ready for
commit access, we'd love you forever (or at least until you turn us
* Peter Breitenlohner wrote:
[...]
Subject: Re: Ansification of X.Org code other cleanup work
[...]
(1) trivial changes to avoid gcc warnings (certainly not adding const or
other changes to public APIs).
This has to be done very careful. Changing code to silence the compiler
can
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
From a comment in a patch Peter recently submitted:
libXpm is one of the libraries that still could need ANSIfication,
I'd offer some help if you tell me to do so.
It is not ansified, but it doesn't have problematic functions,
i.e. KR prototypes with
