On Sat, 2009-01-17 at 18:49 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
I had to hack googleearth to remove the custom libQt so that I could get
fonts displayed in that application...
Sounds like maybe you got bitten by
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19233 (the fix for which is
nominated on the
On Jan 17, 2009, at 23:34, Keith Packard wrote:
On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 04:50 -0200, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
wrote:
It worked as expected in all cases (falling back to builtin fonts
if the real fixed font could not be found)
Thanks much! If a few other people could give this a bit
On Jan 17, 2009, at 18:49, Keith Packard wrote:
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 14:58 -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Jeremy Huddleston
jerem...@freedesktop.org wrote:
Ah... I figured it out... It has to do with --enable-builtin-fonts
going from no by default in 1.5 to
Keith Packard wrote:
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 14:58 -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Jeremy Huddleston
jerem...@freedesktop.org wrote:
Ah... I figured it out... It has to do with --enable-builtin-fonts
going from no by default in 1.5 to yes by default in 1.6 to
On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 04:50 -0200, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
It worked as expected in all cases (falling back to builtin fonts
if the real fixed font could not be found)
Thanks much! If a few other people could give this a bit of review and
testing, I'll consider it a 'bug fix'
Has anyone noticed oddities in font rendering (or perhaps even just
font selection) in the 1.6 branch? It looks fine in 1.5 and in
master, but 1.6 shows something different. I looked through the list
of nominated patches for 1.6 and nothing jumped out as fixing this.
Does someone have a
Le vendredi 16 janvier 2009 à 14:22 -0800, Jeremy Huddleston a écrit :
Has anyone noticed oddities in font rendering (or perhaps even just
font selection) in the 1.6 branch? It looks fine in 1.5 and in
master, but 1.6 shows something different. I looked through the list
of nominated
On Jan 16, 2009, at 14:27, Xavier Bestel wrote:
Le vendredi 16 janvier 2009 à 14:22 -0800, Jeremy Huddleston a écrit :
Has anyone noticed oddities in font rendering (or perhaps even just
font selection) in the 1.6 branch? It looks fine in 1.5 and in
master, but 1.6 shows something
Ah... I figured it out... It has to do with --enable-builtin-fonts
going from no by default in 1.5 to yes by default in 1.6 to being
removed in master.
If this is being punted in master, and has been off in previous
releases, should we turn it back off in 1.6 by reverting
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Jeremy Huddleston
jerem...@freedesktop.org wrote:
Ah... I figured it out... It has to do with --enable-builtin-fonts
going from no by default in 1.5 to yes by default in 1.6 to being
removed in master.
If this is being punted in master, and has been off in
10 matches
Mail list logo
