Re: xorg/driver/xf86-input-jamstudio: [PATCH] Janitor: make distcheck, .gitignore.

2009-02-05 Thread Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
Tiago Vignatti wrote: The gratuitous move of the lines DRIVER_NAME=foo AC_SUBST([DRIVER_NAME]) is to better match the pattern used in video drivers. But maybe it would be better to either actually try to use a solution that makes use of the pattern @driver_n...@_foo = bar and use

Re: xorg/driver/xf86-input-jamstudio: [PATCH] Janitor: make distcheck, .gitignore.

2009-02-05 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 03:27:34PM -0200, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: looking at the git log, jamstudio is dead and I'd rather bury it than put janitor patches in. It makes it look like the driver actually matters. we cannot simply put these dead drivers/libs/etc in some cgit

Re: xorg/driver/xf86-input-jamstudio: [PATCH] Janitor: make distcheck, .gitignore.

2009-02-05 Thread Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
Peter Hutterer wrote: On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 03:27:34PM -0200, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: looking at the git log, jamstudio is dead and I'd rather bury it than put janitor patches in. It makes it look like the driver actually matters. we cannot simply put these dead

Re: xorg/driver/xf86-input-jamstudio: [PATCH] Janitor: make distcheck, .gitignore.

2009-02-04 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 06:25:47PM -0200, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: The gratuitous move of the lines DRIVER_NAME=foo AC_SUBST([DRIVER_NAME]) is to better match the pattern used in video drivers. But maybe it would be better to either actually try to use a solution that