Tino Keitel a écrit :
If I got this right, this implies that HAL still detaches from the
terminal after startup
I'm just pointing out that HAL has all the necessary mechanisms for
Doing It Right (tm). I don't know when the deamon process detaches from
the console. This is left as an exercise
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 02:42:02PM -0200, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
Tino Keitel wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:18:10 +0100, Matija Å uklje wrote:
Dne torek 20. januarja 2009 je Yan Li napisal(a):
I suggest we add a short (5 seconds) busy-wait if hald is not usable.
Isn't
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 08:38:30PM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 17:54:20 +0100, Rémi Cardona wrote:
hald already has a pipe set up between the launcher process and the
daemon process. The launcher process exits when it receives a message
on the pipe from the daemon.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:14:42AM +0100, Rémi Cardona wrote:
Tino Keitel a écrit :
If I got this right, this implies that HAL still detaches from the
terminal after startup
I'm just pointing out that HAL has all the necessary mechanisms for
Doing It Right (tm). I don't know when the
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 05:54:20PM +0100, Rémi Cardona wrote:
Tino Keitel a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:18:10 +0100, Matija Šuklje wrote:
Dne torek 20. januarja 2009 je Yan Li napisal(a):
I suggest we add a short (5 seconds) busy-wait if hald is not usable.
Isn't that more of a
Tino Keitel wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:18:10 +0100, Matija Å uklje wrote:
Dne torek 20. januarja 2009 je Yan Li napisal(a):
I suggest we add a short (5 seconds) busy-wait if hald is not usable.
Isn't that more of a (distro's) init system problem?
The problem is that most of those
Tino Keitel a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:18:10 +0100, Matija Šuklje wrote:
Dne torek 20. januarja 2009 je Yan Li napisal(a):
I suggest we add a short (5 seconds) busy-wait if hald is not usable.
Isn't that more of a (distro's) init system problem?
The problem is that most of those
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 17:54:20 +0100, Rémi Cardona wrote:
[...]
hald already has a pipe set up between the launcher process and the
daemon process. The launcher process exits when it receives a message
on the pipe from the daemon. Maybe that message could be delayed until
HAL is
Dear All,
I've met a problem about xorg server initialization on some
systems: if xorg server is started before hald finished it's
initialization, xorg server's init would fail.
When hald is started in daemon mode, it forks into background and
returns immediately. In the background it needs some
