xcb-util 0.3.0 is now available.
git tag 0.3.0
Changelog
=
Arnaud Fontaine (15):
[icccm] Make xcb_get_text_property() public as it might be useful
for
[property] Add missing xcb_get_any_property_unchecked().
[atom] Move '*discriminated_atom*' functions from icccm to
A new major release 0.12.0 of the pixman library is now
available. New features since 0.10.0 include:
- New image formats with 10 bits per channel (Aaron Plattner)
- SSE2 optimizations for many operations (André Tupinambá)
- Opacity based optimizations for operators (Antoine Azar)
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 15:02 +1000, Russell Shaw wrote:
I think it would be a good idea if there was a default cursor present if
nothing else.
At least when using the ugly grey stipple. If you're using -br, the
missing-cursor plan seems reasonable. Otherwise, it makes debugging X
server startup
Russell Shaw wrote:
Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 01:46:21PM +1000, Russell Shaw wrote:
I built X from git. I get a stippled background when X starts but the
mouse cursor is invisible. The mouse is working because i tested it
with xev. I built and installed in this order:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 04:44:51PM +1000, Russell Shaw wrote:
I realized that without a window manager you get an ugly black cross cursor
which isn't real useful. X should've had a default arrow cursor.
X should've a lot of things.
Cheers,
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Søren Hauberg wrote:
Can I somehow force the evdev driver to only accept absolute events?
I'll see if I can find the time to look into fixing the issue, as I
guess it could be related to my problems. But like everybody else I'm
in lack of time, so I'm not sure if it'll be doable.
Adding an
Hello,
I tried to run the latest Xserver and the Intel driver (both current git
head). It segfaults at the startup:
Core was generated by `/usr/local/X11R7.5/bin/Xorg :1.0'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
[New process 3191]
#0 intel_nondrm_exec (bo=0x100aec0, used=16,
Dear list,
I have a problem understanding what I need to do to configure my
xorg.conf to properly use my external CRT and Laptops LCD so that I can
correctly use the Big Desktop feature to extend my desktop (when
connected to the external monitor) using the CRT as the primary (left of
laptop)
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 23:39 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 15:02 +1000, Russell Shaw wrote:
I think it would be a good idea if there was a default cursor present if
nothing else.
At least when using the ugly grey stipple. If you're using -br, the
missing-cursor plan
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 16:28 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all, recently I was put in charge of creating a clean
room implementation of the XDMCP protocol for our Apple Terminal
Server product. This was done for various political and technical
reasons which are beyond the scope of this
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 18:13 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
Here's a tiny fix for the damage protocol specification
Applied, thanks!
- ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
... I don't believe this anywhere near the functionality that I am talking
about. If I am mistaken please elaborate on how to do it with xrandr.
Regards,
-Clay
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I guess basically my question is what would it take to do
Well it certainly isn't a checkbox... and I haven't found any tutorials on
it.
It seems like it may need so driver cooperation too. Does X already have
the ability to add viewpoints to an existing instance?
Thanks,
-Clay
P.S. Should have been I don't believe this has on that last email...
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:57:13 -0500
Clayton Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... I don't believe this anywhere near the functionality that I am talking
about. If I am mistaken please elaborate on how to do it with xrandr.
Set the virtual desktop nice and large in size, define both displays as
Yes, but that won't display the application bar on each monitor or allow you
to rotate workspaces independently will it?
Thanks,
-Clay
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:57:13 -0500
Clayton Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... I
Yes, but that won't display the application bar on each monitor or allow you
to rotate workspaces independently will it?
What gets displayed on each desktop depends what you put there. If it
doesn't do what you want send the relevant application authors patches.
As to rotation - yes xrandr
Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:51:47PM -0500, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
After ioquake3 is started all keyb and mouse input stop. You can't move
the cursor, you can't click. Switching to another application isn't
possible, even switching to the VTs isn't possible.
All input is
I will play with this more, but I still am skeptical that it will do what I
am describing.
In the past when I tried this it seemed as though either each monitor
displayed a separate set of workspaces (you couldn't have both monitors
sharing workspaces), the application bar extended across both
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Keith Packard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Owen Taylor has been poking at Composite for a while now and has helped
uncover a couple of interesting corner cases. Here are two patches, the
first is a correctness patch which fixes parent clip recomputation when
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 09:08:49AM -0500, Clayton Shepard wrote:
Well it certainly isn't a checkbox... and I haven't found any tutorials on
it.
I wasn't clear enough. Code can be written to make Compiz do this. I
don't think it has been written yet.
It seems like it may need so driver
http://www.linux.com/feature/148339
SGI used their or later privilege to upgrade to the X11 licence. w00t!
- d.
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 09:06 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 17:11 +0200, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
Is there a reason why you didn't commit these patches?
Owen hasn't tested the second patch yet. Also, it's nice to see if
anyone has comments on the patch before they hit
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 17:54 +0100, David Gerard wrote:
http://www.linux.com/feature/148339
SGI used their or later privilege to upgrade to the X11 licence. w00t!
I've updated the server source in git to reflect FreeB 2.0. Older
servers are exactly as free now, you just have to be aware that
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 08:28 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 09:45 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 23:39 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 15:02 +1000, Russell Shaw wrote:
I think it would be a good idea if there was a default cursor
Couple enhancements to build.sh. The first patch simply adds Mesa and
libdrm support.
The second patch adds the capability to customize configure flags for
modules and components. It's done by passing in a file on the command
line which is in the following format:
all:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 09:24 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Chuck Robey wrote:
Sorry, I can't parse what you wrote. You don't know where I heard that
Xorg is
Linux-only? Is that what you said? My understanding *had been*
Both Solaris and BSD have very similar event APIs, afaik, and could
easily have drivers for same. But they don't. Patches gratefully etc.
- ajax
I'm really rather curious where you got the idea that FreeBSD had something
that looked even vaguely like the Linux events. I know that if
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Owen Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 09:06 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 17:11 +0200, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
Is there a reason why you didn't commit these patches?
Owen hasn't tested the second patch yet. Also, it's
Can anyone comment on the relationship between this and mesa?
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
John Tapsell johnflux at gmail.com writes:
Can anyone comment on the relationship between this and mesa?
Recalling from reading the Debian bug report that started this whole thing, this
covers GLX (server side), I believe, at least as far as non-DFSG-free code
already in the server. Mesa is a
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 13:44 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
Thanks for checking things out; I will go ahead and push them now.
I guess I might quibble with the comment in the second one which makes
it sounds like this has to do with exotic guffaw scrolling manipulations
or something.
Older window
http://www.aquaconnect.net/?p=400
Sorry, no posts matched your criteria.
I got the same error this morning at work, but tonight
at home it appears to now be working okay.
Pat
---
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Adam Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 16:28 -0700,
Keith Packard wrote:
Yes, I'm cool with the black root background; nicer looking, conforming
to the spec and everything.
As a X user and occasional embedded programmer, might I suggest
something with a pattern? Even if it's a X logo in the center, or just
a shapeless blob, or a row and
Keith Packard wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 13:52 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
You don't ask for the stipple though. It's the default.
My point was that if you want to avoid the vintage X appearance, you'd
likely start the X server with a black root window instead of the ugly
stipple, and
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 10:01 -0500, Clayton Shepard wrote:
I will play with this more, but I still am skeptical that it will do
what I am describing.
In the past when I tried this it seemed as though either each monitor
displayed a separate set of workspaces (you couldn't have both
monitors
Hi all. I've been on the 'bleeding edge' ( git ) of mesa, xserver,
xf86-video-ati friends for the past year or so ( on Gentoo ). I've got
a Turion ( AMD64 ) processor ( running in 64-bit mode ), and a Radeon
X700 Mobility.
I updated everything about a week ago, and couldn't get into X at all -
36 matches
Mail list logo
