Hi,
As discussed a while back [1], there are a number of issues which can
only be resolved by using an Xdummy binary server in order to replace
Xvfb with a more modern equivalent. The only alternative I can think of
would be to add a -dummy command line option to Xorg, this feels
somewhat more
On 05/28/2011 07:22 AM, Evgeny M. Zubok wrote:
David Jackson djackson...@gmail.com writes:
The client wouldnt have to be moved between servers at all, it could
be the same proxy server, the proxy server could then open up
connections to actual X servers and forward things to the real X
On 05/28/2011 12:39 AM, David Jackson wrote:
THanks for the info on XPRA. I will give it a try. It looks promising
and the way they use the compositing manager sounds genius. It sounds
like they get basically final rasterised data from the compositor, so
basically it seems like a huge bitmap,
Hi,
Patch now sent twice... Am I doing this wrong?
Do you need me to make changes or test something else?
Cheers
Antoine
On 04/13/2011 07:41 PM, Antoine Martin wrote:
Hi Adam,
Can you please apply this patch please?
Re-sending as a separate thread with patch in git format-patch.
I have
:00:00 2001
From: Antoine Martin anto...@devloop.org.uk
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 19:30:26 +0700
Subject: [PATCH] Constifies and increases the maximum size allowed for dummy
screens to 32767x32767
Signed-off-by: Antoine Martin anto...@devloop.org.uk
Tested-by: Antoine Martin anto...@devloop.org.uk
On 04/07/2011 06:57 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On 4/6/11 6:38 PM, Aaron Plattner wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 02:37:52PM -0700, Antoine Martin wrote:
diff --git a/src/dummy_driver.c b/src/dummy_driver.c
index 804e41e..05450d5 100644
--- a/src/dummy_driver.c
+++ b/src/dummy_driver.c
@@ -85,6
Hi,
As suggested on this list a while back, I am trying to replace Xvfb with
the Xorg + dummy driver.
1) I can't seem to make it use resolutions higher than 2048x2048 which
is a major showstopper for me:
Virtual height (2560) is too large for the hardware (max 2048)
Virtual width (3840) is too
On 04/06/2011 09:13 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On 4/6/11 6:51 AM, Antoine Martin wrote:
1) I can't seem to make it use resolutions higher than 2048x2048 which
is a major showstopper for me:
Virtual height (2560) is too large for the hardware (max 2048)
Virtual width (3840) is too large
Have a look at wmctl and devilspie
A.
Yan Seiner y...@seiner.com wrote:
OK, I know this is more of a WM question...
I'm looking for a CLI utility that would let me manipulate (resize and
relocate) windows based on WM_NAME or WM_CLASS. Is anyone aware of any
such thing?
I need to open a
On 07/09/2010 03:21 AM, Liew, Philip wrote:
Hi,
I just have a question regarding restoring lost X connections.
I was running an application remotely through X and during the course of
the day that connection dropped. The application was still running but
I was no longer
Done:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28673
I have added a little bit of info on there: these extra clicks happen
more often on some machines than others... no idea why.
Antoine
On 06/21/2010 07:05 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 04:40:44PM +0700, Antoine Martin
.
Antoine Martin wrote:
On 05/28/2010 01:52 AM, Collins, Cris wrote:
I am trying to get dual heads and xinerama to work with Xvfb and
getting:
xdpyinfo -ext XINERAMA
Xlib: extension XINERAMA missing on display :0.0.
XINERAMA extension not supported by server
That's your answer.
Xvfb
On 05/28/2010 01:52 AM, Collins, Cris wrote:
I am trying to get dual heads and xinerama to work with Xvfb and getting:
xdpyinfo -ext XINERAMA
Xlib: extension XINERAMA missing on display :0.0.
XINERAMA extension not supported by server
That's your answer.
Xvfb :90 -screen 0 1024x2048x24
* 3 (rather than
on/off/disabled)
Is there another extension which can be used to figure out if the screen
is locked?
Thanks
Antoine
Antoine Martin wrote:
Hi,
What is the official way of detecting when the screensaver is activated?
I thought it might be the _SCREENSAVER_STATUS property
Hi,
I found this post about implementing RandR for Xvnc:
http://www.nabble.com/Implementing-RandR-td19513964.html
Does anyone know what the status is on this?
Is there a patch?
How much work is left/would it be to get RandR working on Xvfb?
Thanks
Antoine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
As can be seen in the:
[ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.6.0
There is a commit named:
Disable XvMC on DRI2 for now
XvMC is quite important in desktop environments (as it is
very difficult to get decent video playback speed without it)
Are
16 matches
Mail list logo
