to save a megabyte or 2 of RAM makes no
sense whatsoever.
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 2:33 AM, Alan Coopersmith
alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
On 07/16/11 06:43 PM, David Jackson wrote:
Has the X.org organisation ever thought of promoting X.org for use by
companies
on thier handheld
Has the X.org organisation ever thought of promoting X.org for use by
companies on thier handheld devices such as phones? X has really missed the
boat on this one. Years ago, in their infinite wisdom, X.org developers
removed monochrome support and low colour support, things that would have
been
sorry i was wrong
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 2:35 AM, Evgeny M. Zubok evgeny.zu...@tochka.ruwrote:
David Jackson djackson...@gmail.com writes:
As far as I know NX is a tunneling and compression technology but will
not maintain a persistant X applications or session. The applications
, 2011 at 8:02 AM, David Jackson djackson...@gmail.comwrote:
sorry i was wrong
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 2:35 AM, Evgeny M. Zubok
evgeny.zu...@tochka.ruwrote:
David Jackson djackson...@gmail.com writes:
As far as I know NX is a tunneling and compression technology but will
not maintain
rootless operation is a big advantage in certain cases. But you are right,
it does not forward any vector graphics data, such as GLX commands, which
probably are somewhat faster than rasterised data. Currently, i am using
xpra and x11vnc on Xvfb. When you use x11vnc on Xvfb, it seems to work much
I meant to say, xvfb. not xrfb. The xvfb and x11vnc combo works great and is
better than Xvnc. So far it has fixed my problems with not being able to use
konqueror on VNC.
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 8:35 AM, David Jackson djackson...@gmail.comwrote:
I have recently started running x11vnc
, 2011 at 2:29 PM, David Jackson djackson...@gmail.comwrote:
The client wouldnt have to be moved between servers at all, it could be the
same proxy server, the proxy server could then open up connections to actual
X servers and forward things to the real X servers. The proxy would massage
Thank you for the information. As I mentioned, I was previously aware of
Xmx, Xmove and XTV..
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Alan Coopersmith
alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
On 05/26/11 12:29 PM, David Jackson wrote:
The client wouldnt have to be moved between servers at all, it could
need to be rasterised as
well since some windows may be partially or fully non visible.
I have not had the opportunity to study modern video hardware so these are
guesses.
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:23 PM, David Jackson djackson...@gmail.comwrote:
Thank you for the information. As I mentioned, I
also listen to this advice. in the case of X,
this also includes not only documenting fully how the server works and its
internals, but also how video hardware works.
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Antoine Martin anto...@nagafix.co.ukwrote:
On 05/28/2011 12:39 AM, David Jackson wrote:
THanks
, May 27, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Evgeny M. Zubok evgeny.zu...@tochka.ruwrote:
David Jackson djackson...@gmail.com writes:
The client wouldnt have to be moved between servers at all, it could
be the same proxy server, the proxy server could then open up
connections to actual X servers and forward
version is that since VNC
has a GPL license I can not merge the code into my Xorg
source tree.
Pat
---
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 6:07 PM, David Jackson djackson...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Glynn Clements
gl...@gclements.plus.com
wrote:
David Jackson wrote
,
the other was something called Xshare or something, and I am aware of a
possible third that was called XTV. None are actively developed at this
time.
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Glynn Clements
gl...@gclements.plus.comwrote:
David Jackson wrote:
I am know C, however I know little about
X.org needs to listen to users on X Window System flexibility. X has
always been about mechanism, not policy, that allows users choice and
flexibility, such as in window manangers. Many people I talk to, including
myself, find remote desktop capabilities extremly useful and greatly
increase the
document.
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Corbin Simpson
mostawesomed...@gmail.comwrote:
/me trudges through the rest
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:53 PM, David Jackson djackson...@gmail.com
wrote:
Backwards compatability is always a must. It has become clear that X
graphics primatives today
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Alan Coopersmith
alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
On 05/25/11 12:53 PM, David Jackson wrote:
X.org needs to listen to users on X Window System flexibility.
X.Org does listen, but we don't have developers sitting around with nothing
to
do, but instead
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Alan Coopersmith
alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
On 05/25/11 01:54 PM, David Jackson wrote:
I looked for information on vnc.so on Tightvnc's website.
Tiger, not Tight, and yes, their website doesn't publish the documentation
for
their software, complain
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Glynn Clements gl...@gclements.plus.comwrote:
David Jackson wrote:
A display driver that contains a VNC server. The problem with x11vnc is
that
it is slow, very slow. XVnc server, which is a X server that contains a
VNC
server but has no hardware
18 matches
Mail list logo
