Re: [PATCH] Handle -displayfd and an explicit display number sensibly

2014-03-25 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Jon TURNEY jon.tur...@dronecode.org.uk wrote: On 24/03/2014 19:56, Kristian Høgsberg wrote: On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Jon TURNEY wrote: Handle -displayfd and an explicit display number sensibly, e.g. use the explicitly specified display number, and write

Re: [PATCH] Handle -displayfd and an explicit display number sensibly

2014-03-24 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Jon TURNEY jon.tur...@dronecode.org.uk wrote: Handle -displayfd and an explicit display number sensibly, e.g. use the explicitly specified display number, and write it to the displayfd I don't think the two options were meant to be used together, but I can see

[PATCH] Handle -displayfd and an explicit display number sensibly

2014-03-19 Thread Jon TURNEY
Handle -displayfd and an explicit display number sensibly, e.g. use the explicitly specified display number, and write it to the displayfd Signed-off-by: Jon TURNEY jon.tur...@dronecode.org.uk --- dix/globals.c| 3 ++- include/opaque.h | 1 + os/connection.c | 11 +-- os/utils.c