On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:25:22 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg k...@bitplanet.net
wrote:
- pos = next, next = __container_of(next-member.next, next,
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:25:22 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg k...@bitplanet.net
wrote:
- pos = next, next = __container_of(next-member.next, next, member))
+ pos = tmp, tmp = __container_of(pos-member.next, tmp, member))
Any reason this uses a ',' instead of a ';'?
Otherwise,
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:25:22 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg k...@bitplanet.net
wrote:
- pos = next, next = __container_of(next-member.next, next, member))
+ pos = tmp, tmp = __container_of(pos-member.next, tmp,
Can't use next as a macro argument since we're accessing the .next field
of struct list.
---
include/list.h |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/list.h b/include/list.h
index 89dc29d..4ce20a8 100644
--- a/include/list.h
+++ b/include/list.h
@@
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 03:25:22PM +0200, ext Kristian H�gsberg wrote:
Can't use next as a macro argument since we're accessing the .next field
of struct list.
---
include/list.h |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/list.h b/include/list.h
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Tiago Vignatti
tiago.vigna...@nokia.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 03:25:22PM +0200, ext Kristian H�gsberg wrote:
Can't use next as a macro argument since we're accessing the .next field
of struct list.
---
include/list.h | 6 +++---
1 files changed,
