Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:25:10 +1000
From: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:09:55PM +0300, Pauli Nieminen wrote:
Source and destination have well defined size so use memcpy instead of
strncpy. strncpy tryes to add NULL to end of destination but it is not
On 28/07/10 11:48 +0200, ext Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:25:10 +1000
From: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:09:55PM +0300, Pauli Nieminen wrote:
Source and destination have well defined size so use memcpy instead of
strncpy.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 02:11:05PM +0300, Pauli Nieminen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:09:55PM +0300, Pauli Nieminen wrote:
Source and destination have well defined size so use memcpy instead of
strncpy. strncpy tryes to add NULL to end of destination but it is not
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 02:11:05PM +0300, Pauli Nieminen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:09:55PM +0300, Pauli Nieminen wrote:
Source and destination have well defined size so use memcpy instead of
strncpy.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 02:11:05PM +0300, Pauli Nieminen wrote:
On 28/07/10 11:48 +0200, ext Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:25:10 +1000
From: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:09:55PM +0300, Pauli Nieminen wrote:
Source and
Source and destination have well defined size so use memcpy instead of
strncpy. strncpy tryes to add NULL to end of destination but it is not
possible if source doesn't have NULL.
Signed-off-by: Pauli Nieminen ext-pauli.niemi...@nokia.com
---
xkb/XKBGAlloc.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2
