---
This is not a patch to be applied. Recently, the utility of list.h was
questioned and as I came a across the cursor hide count code today I
figured it would make a good example of how list.h can make the code
significantly simpler. In particular, it's easy to prepend and iterate
though a
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 03:25:23PM +0200, ext Kristian H�gsberg wrote:
This is not a patch to be applied.
why not?! :)
Tiago
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Tiago Vignatti
tiago.vigna...@nokia.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 03:25:23PM +0200, ext Kristian H�gsberg wrote:
This is not a patch to be applied.
why not?! :)
Oh, I mentioned this in my first attempt to send out these patches
(which git send-mail
2010/6/14 Vignatti Tiago (Nokia-D/Helsinki) tiago.vigna...@nokia.com:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 05:24:16PM +0200, ext Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
I don't think it makes sense to go through the server and replace
existing linked list code. That code is already written and tested,
and replacing it
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 05:48:54PM +0200, ext Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
2010/6/14 Vignatti Tiago (Nokia-D/Helsinki) tiago.vigna...@nokia.com:
I think open coded list implementation everywhere is more error prone than
just have one single set of basic macros. Isn't it?
All the open coded
Twas brillig at 19:16:46 14.06.2010 UTC+03 when tiago.vigna...@nokia.com did
gyre and gimble:
All the open coded lists in ther server are there now, and they're
working. If it's not broken, don't mess with it. If you come
across an error in an open coded list implementation, that would
