On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 20:45 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 13:54:47 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> > bdftopcf is the only consumer of libXfont 1.x's read/write support, and
> > we'd like 1.x to go away entirely. Copy in the BDF read and PCF write
> > support so there's one
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 13:54:47 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> bdftopcf is the only consumer of libXfont 1.x's read/write support, and
> we'd like 1.x to go away entirely. Copy in the BDF read and PCF write
> support so there's one fewer consumer of 1.x.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson
bdftopcf is the only consumer of libXfont 1.x's read/write support, and
we'd like 1.x to go away entirely. Copy in the BDF read and PCF write
support so there's one fewer consumer of 1.x.
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson
---
Makefile.am | 21 +-
atom.c | 250 +++