On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:04:11 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg k...@bitplanet.net
wrote:
Signed-off-by: Kristian Høgsberg k...@bitplanet.net
---
Chris Wilson points out that we were still accessing c-next after free.
Here's an updated version that fixes that.
I've merged this patch (and attempted
2010/9/23 Kristian Høgsberg k...@bitplanet.net:
2010/9/23 Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com:
That seems off to me. This is doing more than changing the c-next
dereference. You're now freeing it where you weren't before.
Previously, you freed it inside:
if (c-isCurrent (c-drawPriv ==
On Sep 27, 2010, at 05:42, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
...
Jeremy, does the above explanation satisfy your concerns? Keith, do
you want to pick this up for master?
Yes, thanks.
On Sep 23, 2010, at 06:04, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
Signed-off-by: Kristian Høgsberg k...@bitplanet.net
---
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:04:11 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg k...@bitplanet.net
wrote:
Signed-off-by: Kristian Høgsberg k...@bitplanet.net
Now that is starting to look familiar ;-)
Reported-by: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org
Tested-by: Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
--
Chris Wilson,
That seems off to me. This is doing more than changing the c-next
dereference. You're now freeing it where you weren't before.
Previously, you freed it inside:
if (c-isCurrent (c-drawPriv == glxPriv || c-readPriv == glxPriv))
if(!c-idExists)
Now, you free it inside:
if (!c-idExists
2010/9/23 Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com:
That seems off to me. This is doing more than changing the c-next
dereference. You're now freeing it where you weren't before.
Previously, you freed it inside:
if (c-isCurrent (c-drawPriv == glxPriv || c-readPriv == glxPriv))
