On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 at 17:56, Stefan Dirsch wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:46:05AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Fri, 2016-04-29 at 11:22 +0200, Stefan Dirsch wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 09:40:05AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 15:21:15 +0200, Stefan Dirsch
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:46:05AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-04-29 at 11:22 +0200, Stefan Dirsch wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 09:40:05AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 15:21:15 +0200, Stefan Dirsch wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Reinhard Max
On Fri, 2016-04-29 at 11:22 +0200, Stefan Dirsch wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 09:40:05AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 15:21:15 +0200, Stefan Dirsch wrote:
> >
> > > From: Reinhard Max
> > >
> > > For IPv6 add a link local addresses to the end of the
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 09:40:05AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 15:21:15 +0200, Stefan Dirsch wrote:
>
> > From: Reinhard Max
> >
> > For IPv6 add a link local addresses to the end of the list passed to
> > the XDMCP servers.
> > Reason: for link local
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 15:21:15 +0200, Stefan Dirsch wrote:
> From: Reinhard Max
>
> For IPv6 add a link local addresses to the end of the list passed to
> the XDMCP servers.
> Reason: for link local addresses the XDMCP server would need to either
> know the interface thru a
From: Reinhard Max
For IPv6 add a link local addresses to the end of the list passed to
the XDMCP servers.
Reason: for link local addresses the XDMCP server would need to either
know the interface thru a scope identifier or try all available interfaces.
If they don't this address