Re: [PATCH xserver 2/2] kdrive: Nuke a bunch of dead code

On Fri, 2016-04-29 at 17:18 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Any chance that can apply to 1/2 as well? > > > Yes.  Yes you can. Merci beaucoup: remote: E: failed to find patch for rev a5dd7b890f4f3a5245639591c73303c5a087b38a. remote: E: failed to find patch for rev

Re: [PATCH xserver 2/2] kdrive: Nuke a bunch of dead code

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 11:16:08 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Fri, 2016-04-29 at 17:01 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:53:22 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > > > > > gcc6 says: > > > > > > keyboard.c:46:21: warning: ‘linux_to_x’ defined but not used > > > > > > Only

Re: [PATCH xserver 2/2] kdrive: Nuke a bunch of dead code

On Fri, 2016-04-29 at 17:01 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:53:22 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > > > gcc6 says: > > > > keyboard.c:46:21: warning: ‘linux_to_x’ defined but not used > > > > Only referenced by a bunch of long if-0'd code, so chuck it all out. > > > >

Re: [PATCH xserver 2/2] kdrive: Nuke a bunch of dead code

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:53:22 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > gcc6 says: > > keyboard.c:46:21: warning: ‘linux_to_x’ defined but not used > > Only referenced by a bunch of long if-0'd code, so chuck it all out. > > Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson > --- >

[PATCH xserver 2/2] kdrive: Nuke a bunch of dead code

gcc6 says: keyboard.c:46:21: warning: ‘linux_to_x’ defined but not used Only referenced by a bunch of long if-0'd code, so chuck it all out. Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson --- hw/kdrive/linux/keyboard.c | 441 - 1 file changed, 441