On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 06:37:47PM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
It's about organization of the code really, which leads to correct
driver API usage, so we could talk about deprecation and proper
versioning of unused/old/unmaintained drivers - we would be
enforcing ourselves to use correct
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 04:30:38PM +0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote:
On 04/05/2011 04:05 PM, ext Daniel Stone wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:45:58PM +0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote:
and bonus points if we could disable/enable the acceleration
architecture in compilation time also.
If we get
Daniel,
On 04/05/2011 05:51 PM, ext Daniel Stone wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 04:30:38PM +0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote:
But my point is (well, always was) to chop off the server internal
modules in parts so we can have a lean implementation for different
purposes and cover everyone's desires.
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 08:21:43PM +0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote:
On 04/05/2011 05:51 PM, ext Daniel Stone wrote:
Sure, but at some stage there has to be a limit. Every configuration
option has a cost: in making the source files larger by putting #ifdefs
everywhere - and you could argue we
