Hi,
Does X11 still uses /dev/mem to directly manipulate the physical memory ?
If not, how is it done these days ?
thank you
nameer
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
Hi
I have stolen the subject of this email from a previous post about the
same topic.
Currently I am using XvPutImage to display a video stream. The video
needs to be overlayed with various items (pixmaps, text, custom
drawing). As it stands there is a lot of flickering of the overlayed
On 02/16/2010 03:10 AM, ext Peter Hutterer wrote:
The problem is not about FireFox. With some effort you can fix it there.
But what about close source software such as Opera?
poke the opera guys :)
Or us (since Opera uses Qt on Linux).
Cheers,
Peter
В сообщении от 16 февраля 2010 10:58:39 автор Bradley T. Hughes написал:
On 02/16/2010 03:10 AM, ext Peter Hutterer wrote:
The problem is not about FireFox. With some effort you can fix it there.
But what about close source software such as Opera?
poke the opera guys :)
Or us (since
On 02/16/2010 10:10 AM, ext Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
В сообщении от 16 февраля 2010 10:58:39 автор Bradley T. Hughes написал:
On 02/16/2010 03:10 AM, ext Peter Hutterer wrote:
The problem is not about FireFox. With some effort you can fix it there.
But what about close source software such as
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 10:39 +0200, Matthew Fincham wrote:
Currently I am using XvPutImage to display a video stream. The video
needs to be overlayed with various items (pixmaps, text, custom
drawing). As it stands there is a lot of flickering of the overlayed
items. When this is
On 16-02-10 11:29, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 10:39 +0200, Matthew Fincham wrote:
Currently I am using XvPutImage to display a video stream. The video
needs to be overlayed with various items (pixmaps, text, custom
drawing). As it stands there is a lot of flickering of
Here is dri2proto version 2.3. This release adds an event designed by
Francisco Jerez to let the server notify clients when the buffers
associated with a drawable become invalid. This can happen when the
drawable is resized or when DRI2SwapBuffer exchanges front and back
buffers.
Francisco
i am another person affect with the miss of zaphod mode , is like martin say
, in some point ( i not sure in what version that this get wrong ) get
broken i am like martin that the xrandr solution not cover (or i dont want
use ) my needs i think is something that the Xorg team need fix up because
Hi,
(Speaking as an ex-Board member.)
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 08:54:27AM +0100, ps wrote:
As X.Org is the successor of the XConsortium, I expect there should be a
roadmap of where X Window development is heading and how much money is
needed to reach these goals and how these funds are
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:21:28 +0100, Luc Verhaegen l...@skynet.be wrote:
Can we get some more details here please? Alanc also mentioned ssl
certificates, FOSDEM 2010 and Videohackfest from the top of his head.
We haven't paid for any SSL certificates, or a video hackfest. The sum
total of our
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 14:17 +0200, Matthew Fincham wrote:
On 16-02-10 11:29, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 10:39 +0200, Matthew Fincham wrote:
Currently I am using XvPutImage to display a video stream. The video
needs to be overlayed with various items (pixmaps, text,
Keith Packard wrote:
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:21:28 +0100, Luc Verhaegen l...@skynet.be wrote:
Can we get some more details here please? Alanc also mentioned ssl
certificates, FOSDEM 2010 and Videohackfest from the top of his head.
We haven't paid for any SSL certificates, or a video
On Feb 16, 10 07:26:35 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
Our outstanding obligations today are MIT hosting for this year ($3000)
and travel expenses for FOSDEM 2010 ($660).
Not that it matters too much, but $3000 sounds pretty hefty for hosting.
OTOH I don't know hardware, bandwidth, or what is
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Matthias Hopf mh...@suse.de wrote:
Not that it matters too much, but $3000 sounds pretty hefty for hosting.
yes; that's fifteen linode instances for instance.
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 07:26:35AM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:21:28 +0100, Luc Verhaegen l...@skynet.be wrote:
Can we get some more details here please? Alanc also mentioned ssl
certificates, FOSDEM 2010 and Videohackfest from the top of his head.
We haven't paid
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:07:32 +0100
Matthias Hopf mh...@suse.de wrote:
On Feb 16, 10 07:26:35 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
Our outstanding obligations today are MIT hosting for this year ($3000)
and travel expenses for FOSDEM 2010 ($660).
Not that it matters too much, but $3000 sounds
Dave Airlie wrote on Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:27:49PM +1000:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Martin Cracauer craca...@cons.org wrote:
Thanks for all the clarifications, Alex.
I understand the desire to drop the lesser used of two similar
subsystems, but it does present a real problem
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 04:45:09PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:07:32 +0100 Matthias Hopf mh...@suse.de wrote:
On Feb 16, 10 07:26:35 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
Our outstanding obligations today are MIT hosting for this year ($3000)
and travel expenses for FOSDEM 2010
[I started a longer reply, but apathy took over.]
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:53:55AM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote:
I just wonder what Xorg's intended endgame is? The direct equivalent
of what MS Windows had for a decade or longer, with everything that
made Unix/X11 stand out being removed?
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 05:01:28PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 04:45:09PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:07:32 +0100 Matthias Hopf mh...@suse.de wrote:
On Feb 16, 10 07:26:35 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
Our outstanding obligations today are MIT
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:54:56 +0100, Matthias Hopf mh...@suse.de wrote:
But something like $100 / month sounds like a reasonable upper limit for
me, and you should actually get by for half of it.
We've got three servers and a switch; the 3U servers are $1200/year, and
the 2U server + switch is
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 06:11:38PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 05:01:28PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 04:45:09PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
Seems pretty extrodinary. Exactly what can't say bluehost provide at
$3.95 a month that MIT can at
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Martin Cracauer craca...@cons.org wrote:
Dave Airlie wrote on Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:27:49PM +1000:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Martin Cracauer craca...@cons.org wrote:
Thanks for all the clarifications, Alex.
I understand the desire to drop the
On Feb 16, 10 09:20:44 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:54:56 +0100, Matthias Hopf mh...@suse.de wrote:
But something like $100 / month sounds like a reasonable upper limit for
me, and you should actually get by for half of it.
We've got three servers and a switch; the
On Feb 16, 10 11:54:35 -0600, Jeremy White wrote:
Keith Packard wrote:
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:54:56 +0100, Matthias Hopf mh...@suse.de wrote:
But something like $100 / month sounds like a reasonable upper limit for
me, and you should actually get by for half of it.
We've got three servers
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 07:00:40PM +0100, Matthias Hopf wrote:
On Feb 16, 10 09:20:44 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:54:56 +0100, Matthias Hopf mh...@suse.de wrote:
But something like $100 / month sounds like a reasonable upper limit for
me, and you should
Since there's been a lot of other server stuff thrown around, anyone
have any idea how much bandwidth fd.o uses?
Cody Maloney
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 07:00:40PM +0100, Matthias Hopf wrote:
On Feb 16, 10 09:20:44
Hi,
Sun Fire V40z AMD Opteron 3U Rack Mnt x86 Server:2xAMD Opteron
850 CPUs, 4 DDR1/333 Registered ECC DIMMs (4x1GB), 1x73GB 10K RPM
Thanks; somewhat entry-level by 2010 standards (unsurprisingly), then.
Sounds like the decision is between:
(a) get them going anyway, perhaps use for
There is a good expression for that in Russian. распил бабла =
raspil babla ~= split the loot ;) That's a usual thing with the
budgets in (new-Soviet) Russia - when it is spent on inadequately
expensive things (and part of the price returns to the govt people as
a form of bribes, named откат =
Regarding hosting, the possibility of OSUOSL is still on the table. At least
one sysadmin is on our side, and I'm increasingly looking towards the
seven-year plan, so there are two of us here.
Posting from a mobile, pardon my terseness. ~ C.
On Feb 16, 2010 1:05 PM, Alan Coopersmith
Hi Corbin,
Regarding hosting, the possibility of OSUOSL is still on the
table. At least one sysadmin is on our side, and I'm increasingly
looking towards the seven-year plan, so there are two of us here.
Last time I looked at OSUOSL for hosting, they wouldn't let people
have root on
That's a good question. I know at least one admin, warthog9, has full
control of his machines. I think it varies depending on the group and the
extent of the hosting.
Posting from a mobile, pardon my terseness. ~ C.
On Feb 16, 2010 2:58 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi Corbin,
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 09:58:39AM +0100, Bradley T. Hughes wrote:
On 02/16/2010 03:10 AM, ext Peter Hutterer wrote:
The problem is not about FireFox. With some effort you can fix it there.
But what about close source software such as Opera?
poke the opera guys :)
Or us (since Opera uses
evidence type=anecdotal
I do know a few people who got an unpleasant surprise when this
stopped working for them, only to discover Xorg had taken it out a
year or so before but their distro had only just upgraded to that
version. They were rather upset and annoyed. (Though conceding the
Martin Cracauer wrote:
...
Anyway...
I will also spend some time this week to test the available Window
managers to see where they stand wrt xrandr and report back. I
noticed that fvwm2 seems broken enough to not even get keyboard focus
over to the added desktops, ever. I also don't
On 16-02-10 17:27, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 14:17 +0200, Matthew Fincham wrote:
On 16-02-10 11:29, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 10:39 +0200, Matthew Fincham wrote:
Currently I am using XvPutImage to display a video stream. The video
needs
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 02:02:21PM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Daniel Stone wrote:
#xorg-bod on OFTC, fortnightly. I think it's something like 10AM
Wednesdays, Portland time?
For TZ=US/Pacific, 2pm on every other Tuesday. (My calendar shows
the next ones are 2/16 3/2.)
We should
On 17-02-10 07:57, Matthew Fincham wrote:
On 16-02-10 17:27, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 14:17 +0200, Matthew Fincham wrote:
On 16-02-10 11:29, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 10:39 +0200, Matthew Fincham wrote:
Currently I am
Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 02:02:21PM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Daniel Stone wrote:
#xorg-bod on OFTC, fortnightly. I think it's something like 10AM
Wednesdays, Portland time?
For TZ=US/Pacific, 2pm on every other Tuesday. (My calendar shows
the next ones are 2/16
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:29:04PM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 02:02:21PM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Daniel Stone wrote:
#xorg-bod on OFTC, fortnightly. I think it's something like 10AM
Wednesdays, Portland time?
For TZ=US/Pacific,
Here is dri2proto version 2.3. This release adds an event designed by
Francisco Jerez to let the server notify clients when the buffers
associated with a drawable become invalid. This can happen when the
drawable is resized or when DRI2SwapBuffer exchanges front and back
buffers.
Francisco
42 matches
Mail list logo
