You've got the options now to adjust yourself.
Option XvHsync value
Option XvVsync value
where value is an integer for displacement in that direction.
Alan.
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 12:49:04PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have noticed a small but annoying
Hello Alan,
This is the results i get from changing the sync values:
With Hsync 0 Vsync 0 i get a green line i the bottom of the window, and some
flickering to the right in the window. The bottom green line is not all green
there are som junk in it too.
If i increment XvVsync i get rid of the
On Fri, 2002-01-04 at 08:49, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
What is the best pure 2D card in X11 with non-binary-only (read nvidia)
drivers? Does a Matrox G450/550 compare to GeForce Radeon in 2D?
Matrox is the only company I've ever heard make noise about their 2D
performance. The box from my
I'd like to be using XV with my savage IXC, which looks to be built
in the current CVS ...
While I don't want to overwrite a working 4.1 install, CVS looks like
the only way to get this.
any reason to think this will / won't work?
forrest
___
Xpert
for radeon/ve's, and radeon/all-in-wonder's with dvi-d
connections
what i find works best is to let XFree86 -configure
build an XF86Config, then add
Modes 1024x768
(specifically, the exact size of the flat-pannel)
to the
Matrox is the only company I've ever heard make noise about their 2D
performance. The box from my G400 DualHead billed it as the fastest
2D accelerator ever created. Don't know if it's true, but the 2D
performs quite well for me!
The mga driver has a very good reputation for 2D
I hope that this somehow wends its way to the correct people. I
recently purchased a Toshiba 1805-274 laptop with a Trident CyberBlade-T
(Maybe CyberBlade-XP Ai1) graphics chip in part because I relied on the
representations on the Trident Web page that the graphics controller was
supported by
Ross Vandegrift [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Matrox is the only company I've ever heard make noise about their 2D
performance. The box from my G400 DualHead billed it as the fastest
2D accelerator ever created. Don't know if it's true, but the 2D
performs quite well for me!
The
I've been reading everything I can find on this card, and there's so much
conflicting and outdated info out there I'm getting confused. I'm running
Mandrake 8.1 on an older Pentium II, with a BX chipset.
**I know some of these questions are newbie type questions, but if I fully
understood
Is there some reasonable way of actually evaluating what memory is
being used by X these days?
% ps aux | grep X | grep deferglyph
root 412 5.8 10.0 231512 64540 ? S 13:12 4:23 /usr/bin/X11/X :0
-deferglyphs 16 -nolisten tcp vt7 -auth /var/lib/gdm/:0.Xauth
This suggests that
With XFree86 4.1. it appears that downloading the nVidia binary drivers is the only
way to get Xv working. Which can be a problem for those who aren't using an RPM-based
system. Are there any plans for Xv support to be included in the xfree86 source?
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002, ephemeron wrote:
With XFree86 4.1. it appears that downloading the nVidia binary drivers
is the only way to get Xv working. Which can be a problem for those who
aren't using an RPM-based system.
There are also tarballs available on NVIDIA's website.
- Andy Ritger
hi,
Just built xfree86-4.1.99(cvs source) on my new Sony GR290 laptop,
running NetBSD-1.5ZA(current), xf86config builds an /etc/X11/XF86Config
-which works well! Congratulations to all those involved.
-Mel
___
Xpert mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Andy Ritger wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002, ephemeron wrote:
With XFree86 4.1. it appears that downloading the nVidia binary drivers
is the only way to get Xv working. Which can be a problem for those who
aren't using an RPM-based system.
There are also tarballs
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:28:15 -0800 (PST)
Andy Ritger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002, ephemeron wrote:
With XFree86 4.1. it appears that downloading the nVidia binary drivers
is the only way to get Xv working. Which can be a problem for those who
aren't using an RPM-based
ps on many/most systems is completely useless for determining
X's memory usage.
X maps the display into its address space: sometimes the address
space required to do this is large/very large (it isn't just
the VRAM on the board, but also its register area, which can be
arbitrarily large).
On an
Hi,
Could I use MMX assembly for improving the mga video driver? I wrote a
vertical chrominance filter (*) for the XVideo module using inline MMX
assembly. This allows me to improve output quality without any speed penalty.
Of course, I'm using #ifdef USE_MMX_ASM and the original C code as an
On 29 Dec 2001, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:
On Sat, 2001-12-29 at 05:11, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
1) The XFree86 Radeon 7500 driver treats the monitor connected to the DVI
port as the primary head. To me, this makes perfect sense (if you're
going to buy a digital flat panel,
Hi,
I did the same:
XFree86 Version 4.1.99.4 / X Window System
(protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6600)
Release Date: 28 December 2001
And works fine (Debian Woody, Linux Kernel 2.4.17)
But if I change from text mode to graphic mode it hangs the XFree86
And you?
I will test
Hi,
I have this card, with two monitors at the same resolution with FreeBSD
and Linux (XFree 4.0 and 4.1)
With Solaris you can use XFree or you can patch Solaris 8 and then works.
I have two icewm, one in first monitor and the other one in the other
monitor, without problems.
I don't test
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002, ephemeron wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:28:15 -0800 (PST)
Andy Ritger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002, ephemeron wrote:
With XFree86 4.1. it appears that downloading the nVidia binary drivers
is the only way to get Xv working. Which can be a problem
Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 12:33:16PM -0800, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Yuri van Oers wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Kenneth Crudup wrote:
Looking thru a couple of months of list archives turned up nothing, so:
When running 4.1.0 on my laptop
Kenneth Crudup wrote:
The main reason I went with the 4.X series is 'cause I'd read on the 'net
that it has the ability to use APM (DPMS?) to darken laptop backlights,
but I haven't seen the ability to do this anywhere.
I've got a ProStar (AKA Sager/Kapok/Clevo/...) laptop with a
Ewald Snel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Of course, I'm using #ifdef USE_MMX_ASM and the original C code as
an alternative for other CPU architectures. Runtime detection of MMX
support is not included yet, but will be added if MMX is allowed.
I've also been playing with some mmx-ification of the
Has there been any development in this department? I was wondering if the
Mac-On-Linux OpenFirmware/OpenPROM implementation (minimal, but maybe
enough) would be a potential basis to make something like this work, as
part of an int10-like module. Any thoughts?
Derrik Pates | Sysadmin,
I've also been playing with some mmx-ification of the XVideo routines,
for example I also did an SSE-4:2:0-to-4:2:2 function.
I just did this too, MMX only though. How many cycles/pixel did you
end up with? What percentage of pairing did you achieve?
There was some discussion on #xfree86
Over the holidays I fixed XF86VidModeAddModeLine and
XF86VidModeSwitchToMode in my local copy of 4_1-branch. My patch though
is very strange and not entirely correct.
I don't believe the current CVS code ever worked for anyone: I felt I
was completing the code rather than bugfixing it.
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, greg wright wrote:
I just did this too, MMX only though. How many cycles/pixel did you
end up with? What percentage of pairing did you achieve?
Note that only P5-core chips care about pairing, per-se. There are much
nastier issues involved in modern P6 cores. I haven't
Many thanks for all the replies I got from
my previous post.
I finally managed to get Xfree4.1 working on my
CyberBladeXP following the guidelines presented
in
http://www.deater.net/john/PavilionN5430.html
Cheers,
Luis
Hi there.
Has anyboby managed to get Xfree4.1.0-3 (which comes
I've also been playing with some mmx-ification of the XVideo
routines, for example I also did an SSE-4:2:0-to-4:2:2 function.
I just did this too, MMX only though. How many cycles/pixel did you
end up with? What percentage of pairing did you achieve?
I'll get some numbers in a sec.
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Kevin Brosius wrote:
This is the first time I've heard anything like this recently. How do
you notice the clock shift?
After the machine's been running for a few minutes, and before I start X,
date ; rdate time.nist.gov shows at most a second's difference. 30 mins
after X
Hi,
I wrote a vertical chrominance filter (*) for the XVideo module using
inline MMX assembly. This allows me to improve output quality without
any speed penalty.
Do you mean for upsampling to 4:2:2 ? How do you filter? Do you
average to create the new chroma line?
Something like
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Billy Biggs wrote:
Please, please correct me if I'm wrong here. In MPEG sampling, the
chrominance sample is halfway between the two luminance samples on the
same vertical scanline (by is138182):
o o where o == luma sample
x x == chroma
Hi,
[...]
Something like that, the filter uses 0.75x nearest chrominance sample
and 0.25x second nearest chrominance sample. This is more accurate as
it doesn't shift the chrominance signal by 1 pixel.
Please, please correct me if I'm wrong here. In MPEG sampling, the
chrominance
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Kevin Brosius wrote:
Does 'xset dpms force off' turn off the backlight on that machine?
First thing I tried.
-Kenny
--
Kenneth R. Crudup Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Washington, D.C.
Home1: PO Box 914 Silver Spring, MD 20910-0914
To reply to my own mail :)
Billy Biggs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
It's actually 0.5 pixel (my mistake :)) using the following filter :
o o (c=c1)
c1
o o (c=.5*c1 + .5*c2)
o o (c=c2)
c2
o o (c=.5*c2 + .5*c3)
I don't think this is right for MPEG2.
I sent
Let me summarize the options you've discussed and comment on each.
Assume 59.94 video.
Option 1: Run the display at 59.94. This is what you were attempting to do
by inserting modelines I presume? Using this method you don't
introduce any more judder than already existed in the video sequence.
37 matches
Mail list logo
