Good idea!
Yes, it should be possible to make a general XSLT that transforms a specific
XUpdate to a specific XSLT for that update.
XSLT is the power of XML!
/tobe
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Crull, Torsten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skickat: den 10 september 2002 12:11
Till:
I forgot to add that I have not done this, but something similar:
A general XSLT that converts a specific xhtml to a specific xslt for
converting an xml-document into an xhtml-view.
So, yes, it should be possible.
/tobe
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Gannholm Torbjörn [mailto:[EMAIL
There are a lot of similarities between XSLT and XUpdate. There are also
some differences. (This is a summary of earlier discussions on this line)
For every XUpdate document that can be created, I propose that one could
always write an XSLT that would give the same result (if the result
Gannholm Torbjörn wrote:
Each xml-document is in fact a database, and every database
can be seen as
an xml-document.
So the real difference between xslt and xupdate lies in the
specification of
where the result nodes are to be placed.
This conversation has been had in the past
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Jeroen Breedveld [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skickat: den 8 augusti 2001 12:46
Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ämne: RE: Correction
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Behalf Of Gannholm Torbjörn
I feel I must clarify my position on the conceptual equivalence of a node
and a field (or a row, or whatever).
Please note that I think the node and the xml-database is a better way
because it is more flexible with less trouble, but the fact is that we
sometimes encode metadata in a field, for
