On 2021-01-20 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2021-01-20 00:37:06 [+0100], Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > So this is better than crc64 and close to none while doing
> > something ;)
>
> xz -tv -T0 with crc64 reports:
>
> 100 % 10,2 GiB / 40,0 GiB = 0,255 1,1 GiB/s
On 2021-01-20 00:37:06 [+0100], Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> So this is better than crc64 and close to none while doing something ;)
xz -tv -T0 with crc64 reports:
100 % 10,2 GiB / 40,0 GiB = 0,255 1,1 GiB/s 0:35
and the same archive with xxh3:
100 % 10,2 GiB
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
After seeing the numbers of of openssl's sha256 vs intree, vs crc64 vs
none I decided to look at xxHash 16byte version which got stable in the
0.8 version (given I understood the signs right):
| Performance counter stats for './src/xz/.libs/xz -t xxh3.xz' (5
