On 2021-01-11 Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Lasse Collin, on 2021-01-11 19:19:09 +0200:
> > I understand from your message that you got a different result. I
> > wonder what would explain the difference. Your results are close to
> > what I would expect with the "trap '' PIPE" patch. Are you sure you
>
Hello,
Lasse Collin, on 2021-01-11 19:19:09 +0200:
> Since xz-devel is subscribers only, I quote your message in full and
> also include your test scripts as an attachment for others to see.
Thanks for the notice, I subscribed for convenience.
> I understand from your message that you got a
Hello!
Since xz-devel is subscribers only, I quote your message in full and
also include your test scripts as an attachment for others to see.
On 2021-01-09 Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Lasse Collin, on 2021-01-09 17:38:20 +0200:
> > The following patch replace -cdfq with -cdf and ignores
On 2021-01-08 Lasse Collin wrote:
> It's tempting to ignore exit statuses >= 128 at the end of the script
> where it current checks for "$xz_status" -eq 0 but that doesn't work
> because in the middle of the script there is also this:
>
> case $xz_status in
> *[1-9]*)
On 2020-12-24 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> The `cmp' command will return early if a difference is found while the
> shell script is still invoking the decompressor which writes into the
> closed FD. This results in SIGPIPE / exit code 141.
> By ignoring SIGPIPE the real return code from
