RE: [delicious-discuss] forum for analysis of del.icio.us

2005-10-01 Thread Scott Villarosa
There's lots of things del could be. I guess it's up to Josh and the others
working on the project to go with what they think is best. I know
enthusiastic posts via this discussion group often go unrewarded, so you're
not alone in your want to make del just that much better for users. Get in
line, hey.

-Original Message-
From: Amir Michail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, 1 October 2005 11:39 AM
To: Scott Villarosa
Cc: discuss@del.icio.us
Subject: Re: [delicious-discuss] forum for analysis of del.icio.us

On 10/1/05, Scott Villarosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I think this is it.


Well, if that's the case, then how far do you think we can go in analyzing
del.icio.us users?

Obviously, certain things would be unacceptable such as automatically
inferring an estimate of their IQ based on their bookmarks!

But what about inferring their personality?  Is that going too far? 
What about their profession?  Their true identity?

What other aspects of del.icio.us users would be interesting to discover
(preferably in an automated way)?

Amir

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 On Behalf Of Amir Michail
 Sent: Saturday, 1 October 2005 10:09 AM
 To: discuss@del.icio.us
 Subject: [delicious-discuss] forum for analysis of del.icio.us

 Hi,

 Is there a good forum for analysis of del.icio.us in particular and 
 social bookmarking in general?

 What about a forum for analysis of del.icio.us users and interactions 
 between them?

 Amir
 ___
 discuss mailing list
 discuss@del.icio.us
 http://lists.del.icio.us/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss

 ___
 discuss mailing list
 discuss@del.icio.us
 http://lists.del.icio.us/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss


___
discuss mailing list
discuss@del.icio.us
http://lists.del.icio.us/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [delicious-discuss] forum for analysis of del.icio.us

2005-10-01 Thread sheila miguez
On 9/30/05, Amir Michail [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 10/1/05, Scott Villarosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I think this is it.
 

 Well, if that's the case, then how far do you think we can go in
 analyzing del.icio.us users?

 Obviously, certain things would be unacceptable such as automatically
 inferring an estimate of their IQ based on their bookmarks!

 But what about inferring their personality?  Is that going too far?
 What about their profession?  Their true identity?

I was only just starting to think of this one the other day:

If you have a way to watch users using del in action, you could
observe their categorizing performance under conditions of varying
distraction.

(operationalize the performance by looking at number of tags they use
when in a hurry, at work, etc (semantic distractions vs non-semantic)
as well as the seeming fit of the tags to what they are bookmarking
though that is much more problematic)

That has probably been done before in many, many experiments but the
cool thing is that del is not in an experimental setting and there is
such a huge population of users, and they are voluntarily doing tasks
that in another setting an experimentor might have had to trick them
into doing. Of course the huge problem is that no one declares intent
when using the service--so this is like observing animals in the wild
vs. in a lab. :)

del is like a huge memory experiment, as well as a huge meta-cognition
experiment. In school I remember participating in meta-cognition
experiments where they had pre and post surveys about expected
performance in a class, how many hours one studied for a test, how one
exected to do, etc.

It would be hard to figure out the successful use of a stored link,
but the common intent is to save something to find it later (duh?) and
we get to watch how people think they'll be able to find their
information later. they'll make up a list of key words, and depending
on how they use del use some sort of combination of recall,
recognition, etc.

You could take a population of del users and have an almost guaranteed
set of subjects who have decided to remember something. You could
study recall, recognition. look at the affect of context, infer the
level of processing they did based on the tag set (except this is
clouded now by suggested tags, but otoh you could use this data to
improve suggested tags?) and then study performance based on level of
processing.

just thinking out loud.

--
sheila
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@del.icio.us
http://lists.del.icio.us/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [delicious-discuss] forum for analysis of del.icio.us

2005-10-01 Thread joshua schachter
Presumably, a person followed their own link after storing it would  
be roughly analogous; this is information we should probably gather  
sometime in the future. Likewise, how much a person clicks on their  
own tags.


Joshua

On Oct 1, 2005, at 9:24 AM, sheila miguez wrote:


It would be hard to figure out the successful use of a stored link,
but the common intent is to save something to find it later (duh?) and
we get to watch how people think they'll be able to find their
information later. they'll make up a list of key words, and depending
on how they use del use some sort of combination of recall,
recognition, etc.




--
joshua schachter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
discuss mailing list
discuss@del.icio.us
http://lists.del.icio.us/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [delicious-discuss] forum for analysis of del.icio.us

2005-10-01 Thread Michael Wiik

Presumably, a person followed their own link after storing it would
be roughly analogous; this is information we should probably gather
sometime in the future. Likewise, how much a person clicks on their
own tags.

Joshua


If/when that's done, it'd be great *not* to wrap the URL inside a  
redirector as some other social bookmarking sites do. Unadorned links  
is a del.icio.us advantage.


Thanks,
-Mike

Michael Wiik
Messagenet Communications Research
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@del.icio.us
http://lists.del.icio.us/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [delicious-discuss] forum for analysis of del.icio.us

2005-10-01 Thread joshua schachter




The advantages of unadorned links are copy-ability and that they show  
the right link in the statusbar? I think this is doable without  
breaking those things.


Joshua


If/when that's done, it'd be great *not* to wrap the URL inside a  
redirector as some other social bookmarking sites do. Unadorned  
links is a del.icio.us advantage.


Thanks,
-Mike



--
joshua schachter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
discuss mailing list
discuss@del.icio.us
http://lists.del.icio.us/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss