Hi.
I can't quite put my finger on why, exactly, yet, but I'm not
thrilled about lazy sheep.
We've definitely been burned in the past by alternative posting
interfaces silently corrupting user's data.
I'm also not thrilled about automatic tags and commenting; there
should be some
Interesting -- is the idea to just avoid having to go through the
whole post
process if you just want to bookmark something to check out later
(since you
can just tag something readlater anyway), or are you thinking in the
direction of some of the private tagging that's been discussed on
Greetings del addicts,
I have a theory about del feed and bookmark statistical data and using this
within the realms of the whole del social thingamajig to promote user
exploration and perhaps even generate new user to user relationships as a
result. Basically my idea is based on letting users
Joshua,
I definitely understand what you're saying, I did not foresee some of
the problems that are now arising.
The one change that I have made to the code, very recently, is that
the default number of tags 'borrowed' is limited to 6, instead of
'Unlimited'. What was happening before
Yeah, I guess I don't really see the point of a bookmarklet that just
duplicates the tags and descriptions provided by others...as you
say, the
abuse potential is great and I don't see what the user really gets
out of it:
they'll end up with an erratic tag library that probably won't make
What would be most interesting would be a geneology for discovery...
i.e. via:... via:... via:... enabling you to trace something all the
way back up the chain. This would lend itself to some very interesting
six degrees visualizations... who knows, maybe we're down to 4
degrees by now.
Chris
Joshua,
I definitely understand what you're saying, I did not foresee some of
the problems that are now arising.
The one change that I have made to the code, very recently, is that
the default number of tags 'borrowed' is limited to 6, instead of
'Unlimited'. What was happening before
A while ago Joshua said that my clean feeds (where a given URL will
only appear in the feed once, rather than whenever it gets posted)
was on the TODO list. Any idea when they might come to fruition?
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@del.icio.us
That's pretty much it, exactly. I keep a relatively well-defined tag
library - because I find it to be useful, to me. However, I've simply
run out of time trying to keep it maintained - I just want to throw
my link into del.icio.us and forget it (for now).
I should also bring up that the
John Resig wrote:
I'm really confused as to why you are disabling this - with the
recent change that I made, it does not effect the performance or
usability for other users and, in fact, many many people find this to
be of great help when using del.icio.us (myself included). It helps
to
joshua schachter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would prefer that it either ask or add no tags.
I suppose we need to standardize and support some sort of read later tag,
perhaps system:readlater
How about just system:later? Lots of links aren't meant to be read, and it's
shorter.
--
Or maybe more complete, it can be like system:later:read
Because system:later:download , system:later:forschool and system:later:blogabout would be as valuable as system:later:read
Would it be possible to tag the last part of system:later:... ?
On 9/2/05, John Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12 matches
Mail list logo
