RE: [delicious-discuss] forum for analysis of del.icio.us

2005-10-01 Thread Scott Villarosa
There's lots of things del could be. I guess it's up to Josh and the others working on the project to go with what they think is best. I know enthusiastic posts via this discussion group often go unrewarded, so you're not alone in your want to make del just that much better for users. Get in line,

Re: [delicious-discuss] forum for analysis of del.icio.us

2005-10-01 Thread sheila miguez
On 9/30/05, Amir Michail [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/1/05, Scott Villarosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think this is it. Well, if that's the case, then how far do you think we can go in analyzing del.icio.us users? Obviously, certain things would be unacceptable such as automatically

Re: [delicious-discuss] forum for analysis of del.icio.us

2005-10-01 Thread joshua schachter
Presumably, a person followed their own link after storing it would be roughly analogous; this is information we should probably gather sometime in the future. Likewise, how much a person clicks on their own tags. Joshua On Oct 1, 2005, at 9:24 AM, sheila miguez wrote: It would be hard

Re: [delicious-discuss] forum for analysis of del.icio.us

2005-10-01 Thread Michael Wiik
Presumably, a person followed their own link after storing it would be roughly analogous; this is information we should probably gather sometime in the future. Likewise, how much a person clicks on their own tags. Joshua If/when that's done, it'd be great *not* to wrap the URL inside a

Re: [delicious-discuss] forum for analysis of del.icio.us

2005-10-01 Thread joshua schachter
The advantages of unadorned links are copy-ability and that they show the right link in the statusbar? I think this is doable without breaking those things. Joshua If/when that's done, it'd be great *not* to wrap the URL inside a redirector as some other social bookmarking sites do.