We often thank sources of a link we are adding by using:
thanks to a href="" href="http://www.whatever.com">http://www.whatever.com target=_blankwww.whatever.com/a for the link
in the extended field. They show up as links on our site via the rss
feed but they do not show up as links when looking
It's not really intended as a blogging platform. we may allow a
longer extended notes field and markup but not right now; it probably
won't be plain HTML allowed anyway.
I do not recommend the use of html in the extended field itself; we
are likely to break that at some point.
Joshua
On
Hi Josh
Thanks for the answer...I appreciate what you are saying and will stop
doing that on your recommendation. Will also go through and clean out
existing HTML. Will just include URL's instead without HTML.
Am curious to know why you would break it though? And what is so bad
from your
I ack sources with the via:source convention
On 9/10/05, City Hippy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aha! ok cool...bummer...ok website addresses with no html it is then...
Cheers Josh...love what you are doing...
On 9/10/05, joshua schachter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Javascript, XSS, all
Thanks for the suggestion Edward but as a convention how does that
work...I mean how do people know that via: boingboing is a ref to Boing
Boing...I mean if you had never heard of Boing Boing - which is
possible I suppose ;)
Our goal is to thank those who have led us to a good link. And that
if you consistently do a via:cnn tag instead of the full
url you're creating something other people can imitate,
and something that can be linked to. those are both
useful things.
i am conventionally doing via:delicioususername
for people who I know who are using delicious.
On 9/10/05, City
6 matches
Mail list logo
