Webarchives fit in with priority 1 as well. A webarchive is just a
bundle containing an HTML file and associated graphics files. I have a
feeling I'll still be able to read HTML files in 30 years on whatever
computer I'm using.
I suspect the larger issue will be what to do with my massive
On Jan 10, 2008, at 1:02 PM, Rich Siegel wrote:
Aren't webarchives more flexible/editable than PDF files?
Not in any way that I'm aware. :-)
One big difference is that web archives preserve links, while printing
to PDF doesn't.
Also, depending on your web browser, printing to PDF can
On 1/10/08 at 12:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (TjL) wrote:
Aren't webarchives more flexible/editable than PDF files?
Not in any way that I'm aware. :-)
I've always preferred webarchives to PDFs ... But maybe I'm mistaken?
I can't speak to mistaken on matters of personal preference.
I'd
On Jan 10, 2008, at 9:46 AM, TjL wrote:
Is there a way (OTHER than using Print To Yojimbo) to get a WebArchive
of a webpage to use the Print CSS file?
The new Macworld.com design (which I loathe) took away the easy
printer-friendly URLs. If you actually print them (even to PDF) you
get a
On Jan 10, 2008, at 1:32 PM, Rich Siegel wrote:
One big difference is that web archives preserve links, while
printing
to PDF doesn't.
This may not be universal, but I have a number of PDFs printed from
web pages in which the web links actually work. It's possible that
this is a
On 1/10/08, Rich Siegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/10/08 at 1:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kenneth Kirksey)
wrote:
One big difference is that web archives preserve links, while printing
to PDF doesn't.
YES! Thanks for reminding me... I knew there was a madness to my method :-)
This may