Hi yummers,
There's a feature of another package manager that I like: when a config file
has changed, it asks you if you want to keep your local copy or if you want
to install the package's version. RPM is non-interactive, so it's not
supposed to do this. But I thought this could be implemented
Aurelien Bompard wrote:
Hi yummers,
There's a feature of another package manager that I like: when a config file
has changed, it asks you if you want to keep your local copy or if you want
to install the package's version. RPM is non-interactive, so it's not
supposed to do this. But I thought
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 16:40 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
Aurelien Bompard wrote:
Hi yummers,
There's a feature of another package manager that I like: when a config file
has changed, it asks you if you want to keep your local copy or if you want
to install the package's version. RPM is
I had in an earlier mail discussed the possibility of writing a
separate tool, or an enhancement to YUM or Pirut for offline
update/installation of packages on YUM/RPM based systems, specifically
Fedora.
This formed the basis of my application to Google Summer of Code 2007.
You may find a copy
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 10:12 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Just a side note. The name Rum is already used by a package management
tool: http://code.google.com/p/rum/
And one related to yum, no less.
-sv
___
Yum-devel mailing list
Hi all:
So here, for your amusement and subject to your general mockery, are two
patches that modify the database in such a way as to break compatibility
with existing code.
In a nutshell, the code stores as many values as possible in the db as
integers, rather than text. Also, it drops the
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 18:41 -0400, James Bowes wrote:
Hi all:
So here, for your amusement and subject to your general mockery, are two
patches that modify the database in such a way as to break compatibility
with existing code.
In a nutshell, the code stores as many values as possible in
