Charlie Brady wrote:
On Thu, 3 May 2007, James Bowes wrote:
seth vidal wrote:
* Switch from cvs to git
is git the clear winner on the distributed SCM wars? I always lose
track.
Yes.
In some circles, perhaps. Mercurial is also widely used, very easy to
use and does a very good job.
I
Panu Matilainen wrote:
On Thu, 3 May 2007, Michael E Brown wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:11:46PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 09:18 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
* yum list vendors
List install packages and the rpm vendors, there have been a
lot of
discussions on
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 08:33 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
Panu Matilainen wrote:
On Thu, 3 May 2007, Michael E Brown wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:11:46PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 09:18 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
* yum list vendors
List install packages
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 02:55:03AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 08:33 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
could show something like this
foo-1.0-1.fc7.i386 Vendor X
bar-1.0-2.fc7.noarch Vendor Y
is there a sensible
seth vidal wrote:
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 08:33 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
Panu Matilainen wrote:
On Thu, 3 May 2007, Michael E Brown wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:11:46PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 09:18 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 03:01 +0200, Dr. Peter Poeml wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:11:46PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 09:18 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
5. yum-gate - take the code that rnorwood posted and maybe work on
making it more releasable for folks to
Figured I'd post a few votes on these as one of the owners of a large
environment using yum. I love using the hard work going on here as an
example of how open source produces a better product than proprietary
processes.
Keep up the good work!
On 5/3/07, seth vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
