seth vidal wrote:
On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 10:24 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Jeremy Katz wrote:
The other thing that would be nice (and you alluded to below) would be
actually splitting into a patch series. As it stands right now, it's a
good sized diff and it's
This is an anaconda question, but purely concerning the yum backend, I
think.
anaconda 10 used to log into upgrade.log all packages which were available
but not upgraded. anaconda 11 doesn't, and I miss that behaviour.
Would someone mind taking a moment to give me some quick pointers as to
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
I have tried bot hg and git, hg seams easier to use at first look, but tools
like Cogito[1] makes git easier to use.
both ones will be fine with me. What troubles me a little, is the warning
Jesse[2] sent about hg.
Tim
[1] : http://git.or.cz/cogito/
On Thursday 07 June 2007 13:37:04 Charlie Brady wrote:
AIUI, hg doesn't really need to elegantly deal with lots of branching. You
fork a clone of the repo, then merge patch sets from one to the other as
you wish.
When you have a central system for managing the source, creating new repos is
