seth vidal wrote:
2. don't branch, release 3.2.0 off of HEAD and continue working on HEAD
but w/o breaking the API while we stabilize and work on new items.
+1
Tim
___
Yum-devel mailing list
Yum-devel@linux.duke.edu
Hey folks,
I was thinking some about 3.2.x and after. So a couple of options:
1. branch 3.2.X, stabilize and just fix bugs, no new features, not
really.
or
2. don't branch, release 3.2.0 off of HEAD and continue working on HEAD
but w/o breaking the API while we stabilize and work on new
Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 12:53 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
Hey folks,
I was thinking some about 3.2.x and after. So a couple of options:
[snip]
2. don't branch, release 3.2.0 off of HEAD and continue working on HEAD
but w/o breaking the API while we stabilize and work on new
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 22:23 -0400, James Bowes wrote:
Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 12:53 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
I was thinking some about 3.2.x and after. So a couple of options:
[snip]
2. don't branch, release 3.2.0 off of HEAD and continue working on HEAD
but w/o
