seth vidal wrote:
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 15:37 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 08:26 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
+1, for inclusion in core.
something like
cost=5
in the repo file.
the default value for cost should be '10' or something like that.
So here's an interesting
Florian Festi wrote:
with the current code this is only partially true. In most cases pkg
objects are reused now. IIRC there are a few cases left where we create
new pkg objects. Instead of creating some parallel data structures if
would be easier and much cleaner to fix that last few places
On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 10:19 -0400, James Antill wrote:
But then it'll drop all but one of the base URLs from the upstream
repo. ... this seems like a bad thing to promote. For instance say
Fedora derivatives started doing it, that would be a very bad thing.
I can sort of understand the
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 10:43 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 10:19 -0400, James Antill wrote:
Also one of the things I'd thought about for a future feature would be
to do multiple range requests on different servers to download a package
(I'm thinking about things like
seth vidal wrote:
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 15:37 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 08:26 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
+1, for inclusion in core.
something like
cost=5
in the repo file.
the default value for cost should be '10' or something like that.
So
seth vidal wrote:
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 08:26 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
+1, for inclusion in core.
something like
cost=5
in the repo file.
the default value for cost should be '10' or something like that.
So here's an interesting twist.
cost is really an attribute of a
On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 09:57 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 09:55 -0400, James Antill wrote:
So do you know of any repos that are setup this way? Can you do this
easily with createrepo or something like it?
it is possible to form repodata like this - createrepo cannot
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 15:37 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
So here's an interesting twist.
cost is really an attribute of a package. Since there's nothing saying
a package in repodata has to be at the same url as the repo.
So do you know of any repos that are setup this way? Can you do this
On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 09:55 -0400, James Antill wrote:
So do you know of any repos that are setup this way? Can you do this
easily with createrepo or something like it?
it is possible to form repodata like this - createrepo cannot currently
do it but you can form correct repodata with
seth vidal wrote:
On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 08:27 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
simple-local-repo-priority - allows you to setup a local repo that has
SOME of the pkgs from another repo and know that the ones in the local
(or better priority repo) will be used. This only works for nevra-exact
pkgs
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 08:26 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
+1, for inclusion in core.
something like
cost=5
in the repo file.
the default value for cost should be '10' or something like that.
So here's an interesting twist.
cost is really an attribute of a package. Since there's nothing
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 15:37 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 08:26 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
+1, for inclusion in core.
something like
cost=5
in the repo file.
the default value for cost should be '10' or something like that.
So here's an interesting twist.
On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 00:36 -0400, James Antill wrote:
1. I want to enable an acroread/picasa/whatever specific repo. but I
_probably_ don't want that repo. feeding me their glibc update or
something else outside of that specific application.
we have a mechanism for that, though:
On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 08:27 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
simple-local-repo-priority - allows you to setup a local repo that has
SOME of the pkgs from another repo and know that the ones in the local
(or better priority repo) will be used. This only works for nevra-exact
pkgs from one to
14 matches
Mail list logo
