Re: [zeta-dev] Fwd: Incubator PMC/Board report for July 2010 (gene...@incubator.apache.org)
Fine for me too, BTW in TLP it's a PMC Chair duty. It's the good place if you have any project issue to report to the board. Julien On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I added it. Just to remind you all, reports is a project duty not a mentor duty - later the Zeta PMC will have to report to the board. So better you get used to it now. Cheers! Christian On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Tobias Schlitt tob...@schlitt.info wrote: On 07/02/2010 07:02 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: Zeta Components Zeta Components is a high-quality library of loosely-coupled PHP components. It has entered incubation on 2010-05-21. Therefore the project is still in ramp up phase. In the past month, -all Apache accounts have been created - Jira has been created - SVN repository is prepared for the import. The 3 most important issues to be tackled are: - Create initial incubating infrastructure. - Move project and community to ASF. - Get developement based in ASF moving again. At the moment the SVN export needs to be signed of from the eZ management. Once this is done, SVN can move. +1 Thx for writing it. :) Cheers, Toby
Re: [zeta-dev] Incubator PMC/Board report for February 2011 (zeta-dev@incubator.apache.org)
Hi, Sorry for the lag,I was pretty busy this weekend. It's fine for me. Julien On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Tobias Schlitt tob...@schlitt.info wrote: Hi all, the report is in place now on http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2011. Please review and sign it off. Thanks, Toby -- Tobias Schlitt http://schlitt.info GPG Key: 0xC462BC14 Want to hire me? Need quality assurance? http://qafoo.com eZ Components are Zeta Components now! http://bit.ly/9S7zbn
Re: [zeta-dev] Collection: Projects using Zeta
Some kind of user testimonials ? On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Tobias Schlitt tob...@schlitt.info wrote: Hi, another page I'd like to put on our website is a list of projects (free or non-free), which make use of Zeta Components. If you own such a project, please send a link and a short quote to this thread. If you know someone who owns such projects, please inform him to post here. Quotes can for example contain: - Why do you use Zeta for the project? - Which components do you use? - Why do you like working with Zeta? Thanks, Toby -- Tobias Schlitt http://schlitt.info GPG Key: 0xC462BC14 Want to hire me? Need quality assurance? http://qafoo.com eZ Components are Zeta Components now! http://bit.ly/9S7zbn
Re: [zeta-dev] Migration from Make to Ant
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Derick Rethans der...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Gav... wrote: On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Derick Rethans wrote: On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Jerome Renard wrote: I started to create an Ant based version of the Makefile available in website/ The problem with the Makefile is that it does not work at all on Mac Os X and is kind of hard to read. I am afraid that nobody else uses Ant here, so I would oppose that. Have you asked every user of Zetacomponents whether or not they use Ant? Where are the emails and replies for that? This is not a user thing; it's something to maintain the website of this project. So this is irrelevant. This is an open source project in an open source world housed at an open source organisation. You cannot oppose volunteers scratching their own itch. If jerome wants to provide an Ant alternative I do not see the harm. I do. If you move away from something that we call can maintain, so something that less people can maintain, I think that's the wrong direction. If Jerome then wants to replace Make with Ant then that is another matter but still something that 'you' personally cannot oppose, that is a decision for the Podling PMC or the Incubator PMC, no one person has power here and the sooner folks realise this the sooner you might start attracting those new committers your board report said you needed. Of course I can oppose to replacing Make with Ant. It simple means I am stating that I am against it: op·pose /əˈpoʊz/ Show Spelled [uh-pohz] verb, -posed, -pos·ing. –verb (used with object) 1. to act against or provide resistance to; combat. -- And new committers we need for code, that's for sure. cheers, Derick Anyway it's ASF here, let's look for consensus :) Julien
[zeta-dev] Fwd: Podlings needing copyright sign-off
FYI -- Forwarded message -- From: Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com Date: Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 4:20 AM Subject: Podlings needing copyright sign-off To: general-incubator gene...@incubator.apache.org Here's a list of the projects in the Incubator who need to sign off their copyright item; namely: Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project. The list is: 2007-10-06 jspwiki 2008-01-06 rat 2008-04-15 bluesky (pending retirement) 2008-08-01 empire-db 2008-09-23 etch 2008-09-29 olio 2008-10-01 vcl 2008-10-23 droids 2008-11-12 tashi 2009-02-09 kato 2009-02-13 stonehenge 2009-05-08 ace 2009-05-13 socialsite 2009-06-25 wink 2009-08-07 vxquery 2009-11-08 hise 2009-12-15 clerezza 2010-01-27 manifoldcf 2010-05-19 amber 2010-05-21 deltacloud 2010-05-24 zetacomponents 2010-07-19 chukwa 2010-09-05 nuvem 2010-09-27 alois 2010-11-02 celix 2010-11-12 kitty 2010-11-24 stanbol 2010-12-02 jena 2010-12-02 opennlp 2010-12-08 wave 2011-01-03 mesos 2011-02-01 easyant 2011-02-05 lucene.net 2011-04-30 ognl 2011-06-13 flume 2011-06-13 openofficeorg 2011-06-13 sqoop Some are new podlings, so no huge surprise, but others have been around for a long time. I think each podling needs to focus on getting this checklist item resolved. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [zeta-dev] Incubator PMC/Board report for August 2011 (zeta-dev@incubator.apache.org)
I think we should blame Holidays :) On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: Hello - is anybody out there? On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: Hello guys, in addition to this report, we should discuss if there are some other status items we can check off: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/zetacomponents.html Who volunteers to write the report this time? Cheers Christian On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 4:00 PM, no-re...@apache.org wrote: Dear Zeta Components Developers, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly board report. The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 17 August 2011, 10 am Pacific. The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted one week before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review. Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the incubator PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the very latest you should submit your report is one week prior to the board meeting. Thanks, The Apache Incubator PMC Submitting your Report -- Your report should contain the following: * Your project name * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of the project or necessarily of its field * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation. * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be aware of * How has the community developed since the last report * How has the project developed since the last report. This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2011 Note: This manually populated. You may need to wait a little before this page is created from a template. Mentors --- Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms for the Incubator PMC. Incubator PMC -- http://www.grobmeier.de -- http://www.grobmeier.de
[VOTE] retire zeta components from incubation
Hi, Due to the reasons exposed later, and mainly due to lack of activity : [ ] +1 Retire the Zeta components project and move to another infra like github [ ] -1 Do not retire the project, because ... This vote is open for the next 72 hours. Julien
Re: [VOTE] retire zeta components from incubation
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Benjamin Eberlei kont...@beberlei.de wrote: +1 for github On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.comwrote: On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 2:30 AM, Ole Marius Smestad o...@apache.org wrote: On Friday 13. April 2012 at 10:30, Julien Vermillard wrote: Hi, Due to the reasons exposed later, and mainly due to lack of activity : [X] +1 Retire the Zeta components project and move to another infra like github (I am ambivalent about this vote, but...) I do think that this project can do nicely on github, and what Christian and Julien said about the state of community seems accurate. That being said, I also think think that James' suggestion should be considered, it doesn't seem necessary to block a release, for test infrastructure changes, which presumably can be done at a later point. We have no rush with retiring this project. If you feel that you guys want stay at the ASF no problem. In this case please lets make up a plan and set some kind of a date at which we reflect the situation again. If you want to give it another try change your vote to -1 and lets discuss it again. Surely you'll find open ears. Cheers Christian Hi, Before closing the vote, it would be nice to have a vote of all the involved zeta commiters, if you belive this podling have a chance to regain activity and cutting release, you can vote against the retirement of apache incubator. Julien
Re: [RESULT] Re: [VOTE] retire zeta components from incubation
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Julien Vermillard jvermill...@gmail.com wrote: So let's close this podling. OK. See http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html for the process to follow, including the IPMC vote to make this official. Who'll take care of this cleanup? Hi, I seen this page, I'll do the duty but next week. Julien
Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for May 2012 ([ppmc])
+1 for me On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: i have added a section already - please review cheers christian On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Marvin no-re...@apache.org wrote: Dear podling, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly board report. The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 16 May 2012, 10:00:00 PST. The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and submission (Wed, May 2nd). Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the incubator PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board meeting. Thanks, The Apache Incubator PMC Submitting your Report -- Your report should contain the following: * Your project name * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of the project or necessarily of its field * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation. * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be aware of * How has the community developed since the last report * How has the project developed since the last report. This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2012 Note: This manually populated. You may need to wait a little before this page is created from a template. Mentors --- Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms for the Incubator PMC. Incubator PMC -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
